Welcome to Mr Aslanov’s Lessons
QUESTION-TYPE BASED TESTS
FunEnglishwithme +99894 6333230
D.
Masters stresses that climate will never be the overriding factor - the wealth of nations is too complicated
to be attributable to just one factor. Climate, he feels, somehow combines with other factors such as the
presence of institutions, including governments, and access to trading routes to determine whether a country
will do well. Traditionally, Masters says, economists thought that institutions had the biggest effect on the
economy, because they brought order to a country in the form of, for example, laws and property rights.
With order, so the thinking went, came affluence. “But there are some problems that even countries with
institutions have not been able to get around,” he says. “My feeling is that, as countries get richer, they get
better institutions. And the accumulation of wealth and improvement in governing institutions are both
helped by a favourable environment, including climate.”
E.
This does not mean, he insists, that tropical countries are beyond economic help and destined to remain
penniless. Instead, richer countries should change the way in which foreign aid is given. Instead of aid being
geared towards improving governance, it should be spent on technology to improve agriculture and to
combat disease. Masters cites one example: “There are regions in India that have been provided with
irrigation, agricultural productivity has gone up and there has been an improvement in health.” Supplying
vaccines against tropical diseases and developing crop varieties that can grow in the tropics would break the
poverty cycle.
F.
Other minds have applied themselves to the split between poor and rich nations, citing anthropological,
climatic and zoological reasons for why temperate nations are the most affluent. In 350 BC, Aristotle
observed that “those who live in a cold climate...are full of spirit”. Jared Diamond, from the University of
California at Los Angeles, pointed out in his book Guns, Germs and Steel that Eurasia is broadly aligned
east-west, while Africa and the Americas are aligned north-south. So, in Europe, crops can spread quickly
across latitudes because climates are similar. One of the first domesticated crops, einkorn wheat, spread
quickly from the Middle East into Europe; it took twice as long for corn to spread from Mexico to what is
now the eastern United States. This easy movement along similar latitudes in Eurasia would also have
meant a faster dissemination of other technologies such as the wheel and writing, Diamond speculates. The
region also boasted domesticated livestock, which could provide meat, wool and motive power in the fields.
Blessed with such natural advantages, Eurasia was bound to take off economically.
Dostları ilə paylaş: