39
based affective potential functions for several aspects of the general affective
meaning. These innovative insights may also compensate methodological
disadvantages of our statistical approach using a large number of predictors in
stepwise multiple regression.
19
While we opted for this specific method as it seems
optimal when screening for the most influential ones among a wide range of
possible candidate measures, future studies may apply more fine grained methods
to disentangle the details concerning the interplay of a restricted number of
variables according to more specific research questions.
Future studies should, in particular, extend our investigations to (i) the works
of other writers—as some of our findings may in theory result from an
idiosyncratic writing style of H. M. Enzensberger, (ii) (non-) literary texts or even
everyday speech—in different languages, and (iii) affective ratings from different
types of reader groups including expert readers.
Dostları ilə paylaş: