36
4.3 Univariate analysis of factors influencing implementation
4.3.1 Journal level correlates
There were significantly different levels of uptake between journals (fig.7).
Fig 7.
(a) Journal differences in the uptake of findings were significant (X
2
= 10.53, df= 4, p= 0.03) BC and
O had the highest levels of implementation. (b) There was no relationship between year of publication and
uptake of findings.
This suggests journal level influences on the implementation of research. However,
logistic
regression showed that only BD had significantly lower levels
of implementation than the
baseline (BC) (z= 2.66,df=427,p=<0.007).
4.3.1.2 Citations and Impact factor
The average number of citations per year for each paper from
Google Scholar and ISI WoK
were highly correlated (t = 40.01, df = 465, p= <0.001), and neither had a significant influence
on the uptake of findings (fig. 8 (a)). To emphasis this, research with findings most applicable
at the species level had a higher uptake of findings
into conservation action
(X
2
=7.17,df=2,p=0.03) but a significantly
lower citation rate,
than papers applicable to
multiple species (t=2.2,df=365,p=0.03).