3.4 SIMOPS Risk Evaluation and Risk Assessment
In accordance with HSE (Health Safety Environment) management
system of the plant owner, the risk
associated to each identified SIMOPS scenario was evaluated through semi-quantitative risk assessment
method as per below risk matrix.
Figure 2: Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessment Matrix
The risk matrix is divided into three risk categories as defined below:
• High Risk – this level of risk exposes to intolerable losses to people, assets, environment or reputation; the
hazard should be eliminated or its risk reduced to tolerable levels immediately.
• Medium Risk – acceptable but
must be managed at ALARP; the hazards must be managed to reduce the
frequency and/or the severity of the hazardous events to ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable), the
words “reasonably practicable” imply that the solution must be capable of implementation and that the
benefits should be greater than the disadvantages and costs.
• Low Risk – acceptable without
requiring further action; corrections may be applied as resources allow.
Two different risk levels were assessed. The first was set without considering any risk reduction measures,
and the second one taking credits from control measures and operating procedures existing or planned to be
carried out during the execution of the concerned activity. If the risk
level mitigated by planned
countermeasure was still high or in ALRAP region of the above risk matrix, additional risk reduction measures
were identified by workshop members in order to further control and reduce the associated risk.
To each identified countermeasure the subject responsible for its implementation was
defined and agreed by
all team member. Its name was clearly written down in the SIMOPS worksheet. Clear responsibility
assignment is a key step for successful execution SIMOPS.
Table 3: List of typical risk reduction measures for SIMOPS
Scaffolding removed or if necessary wood boards to
be replaced with metal type
Antispark tools to be used
Barricade and Access Control / Signages
Commissioning Permit
To Work properly in place
Commissioning awareness
Emergency Response Plan
Permanent Firefighting equipment and Fire&Gas detection system in service
Provide temporary firefighting devices if the permanent ones are not yet ready
Provide temporary Fire&Gas detectors if the permanent
system is not ready
Equipment / tools periodically checked (colour coding to be ensured)
Housekeeping, escape way not obstructed
Identification of focal points for the activity
Live
Lines Identified
LOTO isolation procedure and register under LOTO Coordinator responsibility
Risk notification (Safety Alert, STARRT, Tool Box Talk)
Dostları ilə paylaş: