Microsoft Word Interactive Approaches for Vocabulary Te

Journal of Lexicography 12.1, 55-66. 
Powell, S. (2009) The value of play: Constructions of play in government policy in England, 
Children & Society, 23. 1. 29-42.
Read, J. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 
146-161. 
Richards, J. C, Platt, J & Platt, H, (1998). Longman dictionary of language teaching and 
applied linguistics. Hong Kang: Longman. 
Rivers,W. M. (1987, 2000) Interactive language teaching. Beijing: People Education 
Press. 
Shoemaker, C. L. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1991). Interactive techniques for the ESL classroom. 
Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle. 
Storch, N., (2007) Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes, 
Language Teaching Research, 11.2. 143-159.
Storch, N., (2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for 
language development, Language Awareness, 17.2. 95-114. 
Sung, J. & Hsu, H. C. (2009) Korea mothers’ attention regulation and referential speech: 
Associations with language and play in 1-year olds, International Journal of Behavioral 
Development, 33.5. 430-439.

---

The 2009 AE Conference Iso University, Kaohsiung
17
Tribble, C. (2003) Five electronic learners' dictionaries, ELT Journal, 57. 2. 182-197. 
Watanabe, Y. (2008) Peer-Peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: 
Their interactions and reflections, Canadian Modern Language Review, 64.4. 605-635. 
Wells, G., et al (1981). Learning through interaction: The study of language development. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009) Pair versus individual writing: effects on fluency, 
complexity and accuracy, Language Testing, p. 445-466.
Wiki (2009) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_plot 
Yoshida, R. (2008) Learners' perception of corrective feedback in pair work, Foreign 
Language Annals, 41.3 525-541.
Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of 
frequency and contextual richness. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57. 4, 
541-572.