Ministry of higher and secondary special education of the republic of uzbekistan

REFERNCES
1.Abraham,R. (1991). Interaction generated by three computer programs: Analysis of functions of spoken language. In: DUNKEL P. (1991). Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing. Research, Issues and Practice (pp. 133-154). NewYork: Newbury House/HarperCollins. Allen, A. (2010). Interactive Whiteboard Evaluation. Retrieved March 23, 2011, from www.mirandanet.ac.uk/pubs/SMARTBoard.htm.
2.Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard. Microthink Journal, 4–7. Bacon, D. (2011). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Information Technology in Education Journal,pp15-18. Beeland, J.(2002). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help? Retrieved Jan 1st, 2012, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf.
3. Chapelle, J. (2003). How Is the Interactive Whiteboard Being used in Primary School.Becta Research Bursary. Retrieved Dec. 12, 2011, from www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/IFS_interactive whiteboards_ in_the primary _ school.pdf. Cunningham, M. (2003). Laptops for Teachers: An Evaluation of the First of the Initiative. Retrieved September 25, 2011, from www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/ lft_evaluation.pdf.
4.Edwards, J. (2002). interactive whiteboards: Some lessons for the classroom. Micromath (Summer), 30–33. Gerard, F., and Widener, J. (1999). A SMARTer Way to Teach Foreign Language: The SMART Board Interactive Whiteboard as a Language Learning Tool. Retrieved March 23, 2011, from http://edcompass.smarttech. com/en/learning/research/SBforeignlanguageclass.pdf.
5.Kent, P. (2003). e-Teaching – The Elusive Promise. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://edcompass.smarttech.com/en/learning/research/pdf/kent1.pdf. Latham, P. (2002). Teaching and Learning Primary Mathematics: The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards.