paper. In order to defend the nation’s gold reserves, the central bank must raise
interest rates—even though a weakening economy needs the opposite.
Economist
Paul Krugman, who earned a Nobel Prize in 2008 for his work on
international trade, explained recently, “In the early 1930s this mentality led
governments to raise interest rates and slash spending,
despite mass
unemployment, in an attempt to defend their gold reserves. And even when
countries went off gold, the prevailing mentality made them reluctant to cut rates
and create jobs.”
6
If the United States had been on the gold standard in 2007, the
Fed would have been largely powerless to ward off the crisis. Under the gold
standard, a central bank can always devalue the currency (e.g.,
declare that an
ounce of gold buys more dollars than it used to), but that essentially defeats the
purpose of having a gold standard in the first place.
In 1933, Franklin Roosevelt ended the right of individual Americans to
exchange cash for gold, but nations retained that right when making international
settlements. In 1971,
Richard Nixon ended that, too. Inflation in the United
States was making the dollar less desirable; given a choice between $35 and an
ounce of gold, foreign governments were increasingly demanding the gold. After
a weekend of deliberation at Camp David, Nixon unilaterally “closed the gold
window.” Foreign governments could redeem gold for dollars on Friday—but
not on Monday. Since then, the United States (and all other industrialized
nations) have operated with “fiat money,” which is a fancy way of saying that
those dollars are just paper.
Dostları ilə paylaş: