No Paper Title Author Name Page No

MERICAN Journal of Public Diplomacy and International Studies
www.
 grnjournal.us 
 
the point of view of ensuring the circulation of shares (shares), a corporate agreement can be 
concluded both for a fee and for free. 
The next pair of transactions is consensual and realistic. The basis of their differentiation is when 
they are considered structured. When agreement is reached on all important terms, a consensual 
contract is concluded. A contract deemed to have been concluded at the time of delivery of the 
thing is real. The legal basis of this division is Article 365 of the CC. The contract is recognized 
as concluded when the person who sent the offer accepts it (part one). If, in accordance with the 
law, the transfer of property is also required for the conclusion of the contract, the contract is 
considered to have been concluded from the moment of the transfer of the relevant property 
(second part). "The resolution of many issues depends on the moment of signing the contract, 
because its consequences begin to manifest from this moment. At the same time, the offer and its 
acceptance will be completed. [13, 768 p] 
The construction of the corporate contract shows that this contract has a consensual nature, 
because the parties to the contract are required to exercise their rights in a certain way. That is, in 
order for the contract to be considered concluded and the obligation to be imposed on the parties, 
it will be enough to reach an agreement on this condition (voting in a certain way). In addition, 
signs of a consensual agreement appear in the second part of the construction of this contract in 
the corporate contract. Because the obligation to transfer shares (shares) does not show its true 
nature, because this transfer is not recognized as an element necessary for concluding a corporate 
contract, considering the fulfillment of the contract. 
A corporate agreement is often recognized as a management tool, and its purpose is usually 
related to management in one way or another (the corporation in general or a specific situation) 
and provides for the following: 
a)
resolving disputes, "difficult situations" that have arisen or are expected to arise ("deadlock 
resolution" in English); 
b)
increase the level of corporate control by certain participants; 
c)
taking into account even the smallest aspects of intra-corporate relations; 
d)
ensuring corporate rights by neutralizing the undesirable actions of other participants (for 
example, as a result of limiting the relinquishment of participation shares) or fighting against 
a potential takeover; 
e)
ensuring future actions and (or) participation in management, for example (purchase of 
shares of the corporation). [14, 4-5 p] 
There are different approaches to determining the nature of a corporate contract. For example, 
E.V. Zubova believes that a corporate contract is an independent type of civil-law contracts 
complicated by a corporate element. [15, 143-154 p] 
Based on the above, the following conclusions can be formed: 
A corporate contract is an agreement between the participants of a corporate-type legal entity on 
the realization of corporate rights by defining the ways of exercising corporate powers to achieve 
goals that do not conflict with the law and founding documents. fact, as well as informing the 
parties of the corporate contract about the content of the contract, in turn, these cases should be 
determined at the legislative level.