76
B
LANKA
K
NOPOVÁ
music education? Compared to the previous question, where 52,06% of children
stated that music education is less important, it is pleasant to hear that 57,10% of
them state that it is worthy.
From another perspective, the percentage of neutral and
negative answers (altogether 42,90%) could be seen as high, too (see C
RHA
-J
URČÍKO
-
VÁ
-P
RUDÍKOVÁ
2010).
Music education has been considered as a subject of less importance for a long
time. So results of the questionnaire research only supported this fact.
But let’s consider the research results from the perspective of watching the content
programme of a lesson in relation to the number of lessons available to this subject.
Music education at the second stage of primary
education has a donation of
1 lesson per week. This means that a teacher can have approximately 35 lessons in
a school year. In the given number of lessons children should:
a) learn at least 15 new songs
b) listen to 8-10 compositions
c) cooperate on about 10 instrumental accompaniments
d) interconnect 8-10 songs or selected
compositions with movement
It ensues from the given list that the teacher must have a very well thought-out
and elaborated yearly curriculum in which he/she functionally interconnects indivi-
dual activities and links them to learning new things from music theory.
The questionnaire deals with ‘New matters to learn’ – music theory – separately,
same as it deals with the internet or watching musical fi lms. But, from the aspect of
the
structure of a lesson, the named elements cannot be separated – all need to be its
natural constituent.
The following part of the paper will focus on the representation of the vocal,
instrumental, listening and musical movement constituents of education. We come
from the statements of pupils who are not affected by any knowledge of the lesson
structure or involvement of music activities that help in learning new matters.
Dostları ilə paylaş: