Journal of NELTA, Vol. 16 No. 1-2, December 2011
6
(Berman & Ravid, 2006). In this way, they would
acquire the knowledge and tools to assess language
and thereby improve their teaching skills.
The fourth year, during which students complete
an internship in the field, was designed to provide
pre-service students with experience of the
relationship between research and practice. They
were to take advanced courses in second language
research methods, and, under the supervision
of their lecturers, conduct a study in their EFL
classes. Pre-service students would learn to
evaluate L2 knowledge in two perspectives:
grammar and literacy which together provide a
rich picture of learners’ textual abilities in the
second language. These pre-service students
would practice analyses in different genres
(i.e., expository vs. narrative) and in different
modalities (i.e., written vs. spoken). They would
learn how to form research question(s) and
hypotheses, collect data, and analyze them. This
evolution from practitioner to researcher and then
from researcher to practitioner would qualify them
as professional EFL teachers and researchers.
The third project addresses the issue of
methodology. Thus the field of TEFL (Teaching
English as a Foreign Language),
the applied
science, was included in the new professional model
as this area provides the pre-service students with
the practical application of the theory. This aspect
of teacher education involves hands-on workshops
where the pre-service students develop teaching
materials at the elementary and secondary school
levels. In addition, courses in this field include
formal and informal testing thus combining
theory with practical knowledge. The interface of
applied linguistics with the field of TEFL/TESOL
provides the backbone to the theory cum practice
combination.
The fourth project provided another important
dimension of language. It introduced literature,
cinema, and the arts to pre-service students so
as to broaden their horizons and knowledge of
culture. It exposed them to the different genres
of narrative, poetry, and drama and includes all
expressions of language. The rationale for this
project was that language is culture-based, thus,
we cannot train teachers without having provided
an understanding of the complexities of the
cultures behind the language.
The fifth project applied specialized training in
learning disabilities and EFL. As noted earlier,
the increased presence of children with learning
difficulties in the regular classroom and the
inclusion
of children who have dyslexia, attention
difficulties, and difficulty in processing language
in foreign language classes requires that teacher
educators provide their students with critical
information and practice in the area of special
education. At the end of four years, pre-service
students should be able to attend to a child with
learning disabilities in any EFL classroom from
elementary school to the secondary school.
The elementary school teacher should be
knowledgeable about phonological awareness
and how to teach reading based on a phonics,
multisensory approach. The emphasis of
preparation of teachers for the elementary school
should focus on basic decoding skills, word
recognition and vocabulary development, the
strengthening of working memory, storage and
retrieval together and should also provide intensive
training in a multi-sensory, multidisciplinary
approaches to teaching EFL.
The secondary school teacher should concentrate
on reading comprehension as a higher level
cognitive processing activity that includes
knowledge of working memory, attention, and
metacognition. Intensive training should be given
to understanding language
processing difficulties
as well as ADD/ADHD, a learning difficulty that is
not language specific.
By the end of their fourth year, those students
who are carrying out a supervised internship
should be able to apply what they have learned in
the classroom, adapt theory to practice, develop
materials to be used in a heterogeneous classroom
setting, assess their students’ knowledge, and then
return to the college classroom for presentation,
discussion, and evaluation.
Professional development of staff
Any curriculum plan should acknowledge students’
specific needs, expectations, proficiency levels
and attributes. Moreover, it should account for
specific institutional expectations and constraints
(Woodward, 1991) and should make provision for
ongoing professional development. On-going, in-
Goldfus
Journal of NELTA, Vol. 16 No. 1-2, December 2011
7
service training in small interest groups should
be conducted so as to ‘retrain’ veteran teachers
and absorb new faculty. In our setting, we have
moved slowly. Every
course is being researched
so as to provide an understanding of both the
pre-service students’ learning, the development
of the academic course, as well as the effect of
such action research on the lecturer developing
the courses. In many cases, they have had to
reassess their courses and to update themselves in
their field. New faculty members with expertise
and doctoral study in one of the program fields–
linguistics, special education, foreign language
instruction, and literacy—have been recruited.
Teaching loads have been adjusted to acknowledge
the greater connections expected between theory
and practice within the college classroom.
Impact of the changes
In a questionnaire asking the lecturers to reflect
over the changes that have taken place over the last
five years, (appendix 1) the following comments
illustrate these changes and professional
development.
Proficiency courses
‘I have witnessed the immense improvement
in student writing throughout the years. Very
weak students who were unable to write a single
sentence have become proficient essay writers.
The writing and grammar courses in the last few
years have produced excellent results.’
Literature
and cinema
‘The students love these courses and have become
acquainted with a variety of new texts and teaching
strategies that can be used in the classroom.
Following our departmental discussions these
courses have undergone quite a change. The
literature and cinema courses no longer have
a purely academic character – we now put more
emphasis on grammar and writing as well as on
the relevance of these academic studies to the
practical work in the field.’
In a question: “I would like to know the impact of
changes in the department on the faculty staff. Are
you teaching differently? Please explain and give
examples,” these are a couple of comments:
‘During the past five years my teaching
strategies have changed significantly. Thanks
to Carol’s insistence on excellence and on up-
to-date research, I have made an extra effort
to become acquainted with the latest research
in my discipline. I have also understood the
importance of an interdisciplinary approach to
teacher education, and I integrate knowledge and
strategies from different fields during my lessons
(psychology, education, literature, philosopy and
media studies).’
Other members of staff commented on the course
Dostları ilə paylaş: