1.Some people believe that in today's society, paper-based
printing is no longer required. Although these reading
resources can be found online or on computers, I believe that
printed books should not be abandoned.
Two factors make using electrics very appealing, on the one
hand. First, and this should go without saying, modern
technology makes it easier for us to receive messages. With
only the click of a mouse, we can get foreign news without
ever leaving the comfort of our homes, giving us much more
free time. Second, in terms of time, it takes less time to
obtain the most recent information. Ours is a connected and
communicative age of information. It follows that the quicker
we can communicate information, the better communication
that we have.Our productivity may increase when we have
less time for reflection.
On the other hand, I frequently emphasize that printing
materials may be more appropriate in some situations. A
remote location, in particular, lacks Wi-Fi and the Internet,
which might make it difficult for computers to perform to
their full potential. In the meantime, printed books are able
to get around this problem, making it simple for people to
access information from far-off places. In addition, the
majority of senior people who are out of touch prefer to get
their news via newspapers. Because they are accustomed to
reading newspapers rather than using modern technology,
the elderly are more traditional and consequently less eager
to change the way they live, including how they acquire
information.
In conclusion, I think it’s important to keep books and
newspapers around to meet the requirements of various
people, notably the elderly and those who live in rural
places.To sum up, even if many people enjoy reading printed
books or newspapers, it would be preferable if individuals
used some environmentally friendly techniques to further
their education and become more aware of what is
happening in the world.
Every nation has a unique history that it wants to showcase
to the world through a variety of channels. One such
platform is by marketing tourist visas. Because tourism is
their primary source of income, few countries are fully
dependent on this. In terms of strengthening the economy,
well-managed tourism destinations can profit by luring more
visitors. Nevertheless, if not handled properly, this industry
may cause some issues for tourism areas. The tourism sector
in the modern day will be discussed in this essay, along with
its benefits and drawbacks.
First and foremost, encouraging tourism aids in
strengthening the nation’s economy and inspires a lot more
individuals to discover its natural beauty. The nation’s GDP
will directly increase as more individuals start spending
money on valuable items. x. As individuals begin spending
money on worthwhile items in the country, it will
immediately contribute to the country's revenue and aid in
the fight against poverty. For instance, Australia, a tourist
destination, uses the money it receives from visa sales to
meet the needs of its own citizens. Additionally, only a
country with effective management attracts more visitors
since they feel comfortable traveling there. For instance,
New Zealand's well-balanced approach to welcoming visitors
has led to a 40% increase in the number of persons seeking
for tourist visas there.
Second, if the country doesn't satisfy the explorers, it will
have numerous financial difficulties and develop a bad name
abroad. Countries that rely only on this may suffer financially
as the number declines, resulting in a decline in people
trading within the state. For a better example, consider Iran,
which neglected to care for its visitors, causing a sharp
decline in tourism and earning the reputation of being the
worst place to travel.
In conclusion. As a result of individuals beginning to explore
two distinct locations, tourism has grown in importance in
the modern globe. Promoting tourism has a wealth of
benefits, including increased economic growth and the lure
of more visitors from abroad. But if it's not managed
properly, the country's revenue may decline, and gradually,
people would stop going to these kinds of venues.
Ensuring small class sizes is the best method to raise
educational levels. Although I believe that this policy will
undoubtedly assist to improve educational standards, it is not
without drawbacks.
One should first think about some potential disadvantages of
teaching a class to a limited number of students. The price of
education is one current issue. Each surviving individual
student should pay more once the class size is reduced to
offset the cost that would otherwise be shared by a large
number of pupils. This can be particularly troublesome in
places like private schools when there is a lack of funds for
education. A change in the student's personality is yet
another potential result. One cannot be an excellent citizen if
they are not a strong team player. Students learning in
relatively small groups of 3 to 5 have a tendency to acquire
less social behavior and have fewer opportunities to learn to
function as a team.
Having said that, I am in favor of smaller class sizes in order
to raise educational standards. This is due in part to more
time spent interacting between students and teachers. A
teacher may undoubtedly devote more time and attention to
each student if the class is reduced to, say, five students. This
offers the instructor plenty of time to go over class material,
such as homework assignments and a new chapter for the
day, as well as an opportunity to learn more about their
pupils.
The time saved by not having to teach a large class can be
used for additional classroom activities to further drive home
the lessons covered in class, in addition to just discussing
assignments. When taking into account both of these
advantages, a small class size is typically preferred if one
wants to improve the standard of education.In conclusion, I
believe that shrinking the classroom is a wise course of action
in terms of raising educational standards, even though there
are some issues with it.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |