THE 3 rd INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES OF STUDENTS AND YOUNG RESEARCHERS dedicated to the 99
th
anniversary of the National Leader of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev
32
Fig.2. Comparison of Sw values obtained from different models for reservoirs V and
VII horizons
Thus, it can be concluded that the choice of an appropriate petrophysical
model for calculating the reservoir water saturation coefficient is of significant
importance, which directly affects the volume and reserves of the estimated
reservoir.
References 1. Asquith, G., Krygowski D., (2004). Basic well log analysis (second edition). AAPG Methods
in Exploration 16, 244 p.
2. Archie, G. E., (1942). The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir
characteristics. Transactions of the AIME, 146(01), pp. 54-62.
3. Waxman, M.H., and Smits, L.J.M, (1968). Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly
sands.SPE journal.
4. Clavier, C., G. Coates, and J. Dumanoir, (1977). Theoretical and experimental bases for
the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands: Society of Petroleum Engineers,
Annual Meeting, paper SPE-6859.
5. Simandoux, P., (1963). Mesures dielectriques en milieu poreux, application a mesure des
saturations en eau: Etude du Comportement des Massifs Argileux, Revue de l’institut
Francais du Petrole, Supplementary Issue.
6. Poupon, A., & Leveaux, J., (1971). Evaluation of water saturation in shaly formations.
Transactions, SPWLA.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1
2
3
SW
Number of Reservoirs
Zone V
SwArc
SwD
W
SWmin=0.38
SWmax=0.47
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
SW
Number of Reservoirs
Zone VII
SWmin=0.33
SWmax=0.37