Til aspektlari amaliyoti

The critical type of writing
has much in common with a persuasive one except for one thing - 
you are to consider other viewpoints. When you deal with critical writing, you are not limited by 
only your ideas. You can and should look at things through the prism of other aspects and 
people, for example, a researcher who has studied your subject matter. You can go through 
different suggestions, doubts or thoughts in detail and present your interpretation. At the same 
time, you should back your viewpoint with enough evidence as well, and remember about the 
structure of your writing. Here, you will be faced with: 

Debate 

Evaluation 

Disagreement 

Critique 
If you know what critical writing is and can do it well, you probably have excellent skills in 
preparing papers since that is one of the main requirements for this particular type. However, 
even if you aren't confident enough in your writing skills, you may use our short tips: 

All the body paragraphs of your paper should be well-summarized. Identify the key questions, 
methods, and assumptions. 

Formulate a clear viewpoint concerning the subject. You can analyze its advantages or come up 
with more effective approaches to problem-solving, etc. 

Prepare a list of reliable facts that could support your own thoughts well. 
Here is a good example of critical writing ( ): 
The point is that this conclusion was made mainly on the basis of the creature's skeleton 
structure. The researchers did not take into account the phenomenon of convergence: organisms 
with body parts that have a similar structure are not necessarily congruent genetically, as the 
structure is often determined by the environment specificity. A good example of convergence is 
the wings of a butterfly, bird, and a bat. Speaking about Ardie's, there is a belief that researchers 
might have made a mistake in their interpretations, and Ardipithecus is not an ancestor of Homo 
sapiens at all.