85
To recap, the exile in Egypt occupies a conspicuous place in Rashaz's
teachings. It is the first exile in the historiography of the Jewish people, it features
prominently in the Bible, it is associated
with the festival of Passover, and it is
recalled in daily prayers. Moreover, its Hebrew name of Egypt points to the nature of
exile in general, namely, to the entrapment of the
divine vitality within the
limitations of plurality, materiality, and corporeality. Egypt encompasses both the
macro- and the microcosm, as it refers both to the dynamics within the sefirotic
worlds and to the construction and conduct of the individual. Many of the Egyptian
exile’s features overlap with those of other historical exiles, as Egypt is not only the
paradigm
of exile, on which all subsequent exiles are modelled, but it is also a
continuous state, in which the world in general, and
every individual in particular,
exist as long as they remain subject to the limits of time and space.
2.4 The Exodus.
The Exodus mirrors some of the characteristic traits of the exile. Just as the exile
traps the divine vitality within the spatio-temporal framework, so the Exodus frees it
from the boundaries of time and space. Thus to come out of Egypt means to cross the
boundaries and limits (exemplified by temporality and spatiality) that conceal the
true character of the creation by giving the impression that
it is a separate entity
rather than an inherent part of the divine. In the Exodus, one transcends these
boundaries and limits, clinging instead to the supra-temporal and infinite God. This,
in turn, is reflected in the change from one form of the divine name to another: exile
is associated with the name
Elohim
,
79
whereas the Exodus is associated with the
Tetragrammaton (which stands for God’s supra-temporality, as it comprises all three
tenses: “He was, He is, He will be [
hayah, hoveh, yihyeh
]).
80
79
On Elohim as the symbol of God’s concealment within nature, see chapter one, note 47.
80
See LT
Emor
35c. Rashaz refers here to Pharaoh's words: “I know not the Lord [YHVH]” [Ex 5:2]
as a proof that the Four Letter Name of God was not known in the Egyptian exile but was revealed
only later. Elsewhere (TO 56d), Rashaz quotes Ex 6:4, where God explains that He revealed Himself
to the Patriarchs by the name of
Elohim
, and only to Moses at the Exodus by the name YHVH. This
distinction between Elohim and YHVH as referring respectively to the natural and the supra-natural
86
The overcoming of the spatio-temporal dimensions
of the created world in
the redemption from exile does not, however, mean that these limiting dimensions
are to be annihilated and the creation overturned. If the exile was earlier likened to
the narrow strait of the throat, in which the divine words of creation are obstructed
and cease to be audible, then the exodus is the time when the divine voice is heard
loud and clear as it is being revealed throughout the lower levels of creation:
The coming out of Egypt refers to the brain as it emerges out of the strait
[
Dostları ilə paylaş: