It is being argued that media houses should not disclose the personal lives
of statesmen. I completely agree with this statement because it will not
only violate their right to privacy, but also they should focus their
resources on more pressing issues that need immediate attention such as
poverty.
It is the fundamental right of every human being to have their privacy.
Even though they are public figures, their private lives should be away
from the eyes of the media. They should only be judged against the
service towards their countries and not for what is happening in their day-
to-day affairs. The prime example of this can be seen in the Constitution of
the USA, which gives its citizens the right to privacy.
In addition to this, it is the responsibility of newspapers to address
important matters including poverty. Media can be a very powerful
medium, so rather than talking about
other people’s life, resources should
be diverted towards putting pressure on public officials to engage them in
solving real-life problems. Using their influence to the benefit of the
general public should be the main focus of newspapers. For example,
during the Great Depression, The Guardian was the main voice of people
in protesting against the poor living conditions.
In conclusion, I do not support the argument of newspapers publishing the
personal information of government officials. This is because it will result
in the violation of their privacy and also the primary focus of news
agencies should be to highlight key issues concerning the nation.
Some people say that television is useful for education, while others
Dostları ilə paylaş: 
