families, and obtaining this type of information might require breaking the
law.
First and foremost, what makes that the details related to private aspects
of politicians’ lives should not be shared in newspapers is that it could be
harmful not only to these individuals but also to their families. This is
because revealing some details from their
personal lives could expose
them to unwanted comments or allegations, which might lead to a great
deal of distress. In Poland,
for instance, in 2015, the vice-prime minister
committed suicide due to not handling the pressure caused by the
paparazzi invading his and his family’s private life.
Furthermore, obtaining this type of information,
in most cases, means
breaking the law. This is because the right to privacy is one of the most
fundamental policies in society, and anyone who wants to access the lives
of politicians must obtain their consent. However, not only are paparazzi
hired to invade properties belonging to politicians
to take photos without
their permission, but also politicians’ colleagues and relatives are bribe
d to
share confidential facts from their lives. For instance,
an accident in which
Princess Diana was killed was partly caused by the paparazzi who
followed her car, trying to take photos of her and her boyfriend against
their will.
In conclusion, I strong
ly support the suggestion that politicians’ lives
should not be subject to the interest of newspapers because revealing
personal facts from politicians lives could destroy their family life and the
process of obtaining these details often required wrongdoing.
Dostları ilə paylaş: 
