workers, he kept very precise notes on exactly where he caught his specimens.
G
The attention to detail paid off. Beccaloni found that the mimicry rings were flying at two quite
separate altitudes. “Their use of the forest was quite distinctive,” he recalls. “For example, most
members of the clear-winged mimicry ring would fly close to the forest floor, while the majority
of the 12 species in the tiger-winged ring fly high up.” Each mimicry wing had its own
characteristic flight height.
H
However, this being practice rather than theory, things were a bit fuzzy. “They’d spend the
majority of their time flying at a certain height. But they’d also spend a smaller proportion of
their time flying at other heights,” Beccaloni admits. Species weren’t stacked rigidly like
passenger jets waiting to land, but they did appear to have preferred airspace in the forest. So
far, so good, but he still hadn’t explained what causes the various groups of ithomiines and
their chromatic consorts to fly in formations at these particular heights.
I
Then Beccaloni had a bright idea. “I started looking at the distribution of ithomiine larval food
plants within the canopy,” he says. “For each one, I’d record the height to which the host plant
grew and the height above the ground at which the eggs or larvae were found. Once I got them
back to the field station’s lab, it was just a matter of keeping them alive until they pupated and
then hatched into adults which I could identify.
Dostları ilə paylaş: