Day 11
be. These dates seem impossibly early and difficult to reconcile with the available
historical and archeological sources,’ she says.
E
The fourth individual excavated at South Great George’s Street was the most intact
of the group, and revealed the most about the lives and hardships of Vikings at this
time. A powerfully built man in his late teens or early 20s, he was approximately
1,70m. tall by the day’s standards, with the muscular torso and upper limbs that
would have come from hard, ocean-going rowing. His bones showed streets
associated with heavy lifting beginning in childhood. Unlike the three other men, he
was not buried with weapons. Like one of the other men found
at the site, he had a
congenital deformity at the base of his spine, perhaps indicating they were relatives.
Carbon dating gave a wider range for his lifetime, showing a 95 per cent probability
he died between 786 and 955.
F
Tests were also carried out on the four South Great George’s Street men’s isotopic
oxygen levels. Such tests indicate where a person spent their childhood based on
a chemical signature left by groundwater in developing teeth. The results showed
that the two men with the spinal had spent their childhood in Scandinavia. However,
the other two had spent their childhoods
in Ireland or Scotland, another sign of
permanent settlement by Viking families and not just summertime raids by warriors.
G
The evidence of an earlier-than-expected Viking presence in Ireland, based as it is
on forensic tests conducted on a handful of burials, may seem slight. But seemingly
small pieces of evidence can overturn well-established conventions in archaeology.
Both Simpson and Johnson stress more excavations and tests will be needed before
anyone can rewrite the history of Viking settlement, and such work is years away.
Williams adds, There are two possibilities raised by (Simpson’s) work. Either there
was Viking activity earlier than we’ve
realized in Ireland, or there is something in the
water or soil in Dublin skewing the data, and both possibilities need further research.’
Nevertheless, Williams agrees with Simpson and others that the chronology of the
Viking presence in Ireland is uncertain, and that they were possibly trading or raiding
in Ireland before 795. ‘It’s a poorly documented part of history,’ says Williams. But
before there was Viking settlement, there was this big trading zone in the North Sea.
Did it extend to the Irish Sea? We don’t have any evidence to say that, but it could be
just a question of time.’