Data consistently shows that ESL students on all levels score lower in writing than any
themselves as writers. Becoming a proficient writer of English is a problem for many ESL
students as they believe that they simply cannot write English. This becomes more prominent in
self-doubt and anxiety in writing and can hinder the process of achieving writing proficiency
(Thomas, 1993). Researchers believe that it is not the task of writing that is deemed so
intimidating, but more so the feedback and assessment of that writing by instructors and/or peers
Before the 1970’s, writing instruction focused on rules of grammar (Pour-Mohammadi,
an environment that encourages students to take risks in their writing which means less
concentration on conventional rules of writing and more on expression of ideas (Shaughnessy,
7
1998). To do so, means being less critical at the beginning of the writing process in terms of
errors, be it grammatical or otherwise. By not being focused on the errors of a writing piece, a
student feels permitted to express his thoughts more freely. Overlooking the grammatical errors
and focusing on the ideas is a skill to be acquired for certain, but a skill that is essential if
educators desire a decrease in student frustration and an increased level of actual writing.
Furthermore, when creative ideas are not hindered by concerns of using correct form, ESL
students are more likely to progress. This shift of focus is what MacGowan-Gilhooly (1991) calls
a Fluency First Approach. She believes that only after students have learned to express
themselves can they then move toward correction of grammatical errors. With this approach,
MacGowan-Gilhooly (1991) saw higher pass rates among her ESL students.
In addition to the Fluency First Approach, Kasper and Petrello (1998) also suggest that
the type of feedback teachers provide plays a very significant role in
decreasing writing anxiety
of ESL students. Mary Beaven (1977) found that teachers who used shared experiences,
discussed students’ thoughts, and requested additional information as feedback were most
successful in decreasing students’ frustration thus making them feel more confident. Examples of
such feedback would be task oriented questions like: Could you give more information? Could
you start your writing in a way that relates to your main purpose of the paper? This type of
feedback is meant to encourage and provoke more thought regarding ideas rather than correcting
conventional errors. This type of student/teacher conferencing should also include opportunities
for students to ask questions regarding the writing process or the product itself (Hyland 2000).
Dostları ilə paylaş: