By implementing the research-based techniques outlined above, will English language
With the knowledge of the above techniques outlined in the literature review, it was
decided to conduct a research project with a mixed method approach to investigate the validity of
the techniques. The initial study was of the quantitative nature using two segments of second
grade ESOL students. Group 1, the experimental group, consisted of five students whereas
14
Group 2, the control group, consisted of six students. To obtain a baseline for data, ACCESS
scores were used from the previous year as well as a pre-instruction writing sample at the
beginning of the year. The writing sample gathered was a narrative and was scored using a rubric
created by Cobb County to be used with all second graders regardless of their primary language.
The other component of my research was a qualitative method designed to gather
information regarding how ESL students feel about themselves as writers, what their thoughts
were about their actual writing, and what they thought they needed help with. This was done via
a student survey. Teachers were also given a survey inquiring about how they felt about teaching
writing, what areas of concern they had for ESL students, and what techniques they had
previously used.
After the surveys and writing samples were gathered, I met with the teachers I would be
working with to analyze the data. Including myself, the team consisted of three teachers. We
discussed, at great length, the need for writing skills of ELLs to improve and used the data to
pinpoint areas of concern. Following a lengthy discussion, it was decided that there existed a
lack of sufficient vocabulary among the ESL writers, frequent incomplete thoughts, and an
obvious inability to express their ideas effectively. Through the research I previously conducted
along with input from my colleagues, we chose what we thought would be the best strategies to
implement with our second grade ESL students. Strategies we selected were journal writing,
activating prior-knowledge, pre-viewing vocabulary, utilizing graphic organizers, scaffolded
instruction, and increased teacher/peer conferencing. We also decided to make a purposeful effort
to concentrate more on expressing ideas rather than being critical of grammar errors. So as not to
imply that grammar was not taught, we set aside specific times to address those issues.
15
Throughout the year, I, along with the classroom teacher of the experimental group,
Group 1, implemented the above strategies with writer’s workshop. With the control group,
Group 2, the classroom teacher and I simply followed the writer’s workshop curriculum with our
ESOL students.
At the end of the year, ACCESS data and post-instruction writing samples were gathered
for analysis. The writing samples were scored using the same rubric from the beginning of the
year. To continue the necessary ongoing research in this particular area of concern for English
language learners, an action research plan followed. We discussed at length not only what we
could do to continue to help support ESL students in writing, but what techniques we could add.
Dostları ilə paylaş: