Procedure
For the experimental group (Group 1), journals were given to each ESL student. As
explained to the students, the purpose of the journals was to simply get the students writing
without the concern of scrutiny. I started the communication process by commenting about
myself and then writing a question in each journal. They would then be expected to respond, thus
keeping the written conversation going. I would respond back to them and so it continued
throughout the year. As stated in the literature synthesis, these journals were a way to provide
ESL students the opportunity to write with freedom about whatever they desired, ask questions,
and simply practice their English skills. Not only was it beneficial for them, but it also provided
me with much needed insight as to how to help them in the classroom.
Generally speaking, the classroom teacher and I spent about two weeks for each genre of
writing and then repeated the process. In between genres, we addressed grammar issues both on
a basis of need and those outlined in the second grade curriculum. Using the pacing guide as a
map, we navigated our way through the school year quite successfully. She and I took turns
16
being the lead teacher so we each had ample opportunity to be among the students throughout the
lessons. We purposefully set out to create an encouraging writing environment so that all the
students felt comfortable and safe to write their ideas without fear of harsh criticism. However,
as experienced teachers, we knew when we needed to push and when to step back.
We began each genre by activating prior knowledge with a book, a piece of realia, or a
think-pair-share. For example, if the genre was narrative, we had various books on display and/or
discussed television shows and movies that told stories. We then conducted a read-aloud
followed by rich engaging discussions, charting the components of the genre with the students
for a visual aid and future reference. Charting the elements of a narrative led to vocabulary pre-
view opportunities and in this example included the terms setting, characters, problem, solution,
beginning, middle, and end. Using the text we just read, we identified and charted each element.
Through informal assessments such as observations and class participation, we could pinpoint
those who were ready to move on and those who were not. At the beginning of the year, we
repeated this process the following day with a different book. If vocabulary was still a hindrance,
we often physically acted out words of concern, showed examples, and allowed for collaborative
learning experiences with their peers, but we made sure each and every student was ready before
we moved to the next step. Using differentiation, we were able to provide students, who were
ready from the onset of the lesson, opportunities for extension.
For every genre and task, scaffolded instruction was implemented as we progressed
through the writing process. Graphic organizers were used to assist students in organizing their
thoughts for the pre-writing stage. Differentiated organizers were also used as we had one
student who had just moved to the United States and obviously required a more basic organizer.
After modeling a class graphic organizer, the students began completing their own. The next
17
lesson would include taking our ideas from the class organizer, which was projected on the
promethean board, and turning them into sentences. After we modeled our beginning, the
students would create their beginnings and so on. Following each mini-lesson, students wrote
and we monitored the room conferencing with students on a daily basis. When a rough draft was
complete, we modeled revising followed by editing and finally publishing. By the year’s end, the
students were able to go through the process with less assistance and finally independently, but it
was spring before they were ready to do so and some still needed assistance like our new-comer.
During the writing process, we were careful not to focus on punctuation and grammar
mistakes. We wanted the students to have the freedom to express their ideas in written form also
known as Fluency First. Ideally, and from what I gathered from the literature review, not
focusing on conventions during the first half of the year would be greatly beneficial to the ESL
students but it is not realistic as each student is graded in that area with the same rubric every
nine weeks. Since grammar and conventions were scored with each genre, explicit lessons were
provided between genres and of course, when individuals required it, but again, it was not our
focus.
During post-planning, the team reconvened to analyze the data and discuss the
improvement of the writing skills for most of the students and possible reasons for those that did
not. We concurred that using the techniques outlined above proved to be beneficial to not only
ESL students, but to general education students as well.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |