of you? What do funded projects look like? Does yours come
close to that description? Additionally, some funders (e.g., some
think tanks) come with ideological baggage. Does the funder
whose proposal you are considering applying to come with such
baggage? If so, are you willing to live
with having a reputation
for doing ideologically driven work, even though that reputation
may not be deserved? If you answer all of these questions in the
affirmative, then you should submit a proposal. But if you have
any hesitation, you should probably think twice about submitting
a proposal, and wait for a better opportunity. A colleague who sits
on the funder side suggested that
you may even chat with the
program officer to be sure you understand what the funder is
looking for, as this may lead you to grasp some of the nuances of
the research program being funded, which can in turn help with
how you write your proposal.
3.
Set your budget. This is the right time to set your budget, because
(i) it forces you to make your collaborators list their budget needs
within the grant, (ii) allows you to adjust your goals or number of
team members
if your budget is unrealistic, and (iii) the budget
itself will determine the scope of the work done under the grant,
and who is responsible for it. This
is the time to figure out
whether you can use your grant to pay part of your salary, get
summer support,
10
or
buy out of teaching a course, and how much
it will cost to do so.
11
For more on writing your budget, see Pain
(2017).
4.
Make a list of all of the documents you will need to prepare and
assemble. If you apply for a small internal grant, you will usually
need nothing more than a short (i.e., two- to five-page) proposal,
a
short CV, and a budget. But if you apply for a big external grant,
you will need a lot more (e.g., a list of all of your current and past
coauthors
and collaborators, letters of support from research
Dostları ilə paylaş: