176
Labor
and Capital
numerous than serfs, yet even the free were made subject to a variety of fees
and were obliged to perform labor for their ecclesiastical and secular land-
lords. Landowners had also recently renewed a variety of measures to put
the relatively better-off laborers and craftspeople back in what was thought
of as their natural places, out of which they had been breaking free at least
since the first outbreak of the pestilence in 1348 (see “Ordinance
and Statute
of Laborers,” p. 163, and “Sumptuary,” p. 215). Local and probably corrupt
or at least arrogant officials enforced repeated national taxes, including the
inequitable and much-resisted poll taxes. The rebels demanded an end to
serfdom, the heads of those who tried to enforce the recent discriminatory
taxes, and an end to local corruption by means of greater participation in
local governments.
Accounts of large and small rebellions and
their suppression exist in
chronicles, and parliamentary and local records (see the image “Froissart,
Chroniques,” p. 151). Historians credit the “anonimalle” (that is, anonymous)
author’s account in the
Anonimalle Chronicle with accuracy, perhaps even
eye-witness reporting in places, impressions which the attention to detail
and less-distinct expressions of opinion reinforce. The chronicle survives in
a unique manuscript from St. Mary’s
Abbey in York, the Benedictine abbey
of central importance in Yorkshire. It is over 350 folios long and contains
versions of the French
Brut and Latin Lanercost chronicles as well as other
miscellaneous records. The scribes of the manuscript copied from chronicles
and records now lost to continue from where the
Brut finishes its narrative
at 1333, the St. Mary’s compilers ending their account with events in 1382.
Further reading
Dobson, R. B. (ed.) (1983)
The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381. London: Macmillan.
Hilton, R. H. (1973)
Bond Men Made Free: Medieval Peasant Movements and the
Dostları ilə paylaş: