truth and meaning and holds every answer up to the light to ask “How do we
know?”
Having supper with Socrates is not for the faint of heart because Socrates
was relentless. He questioned his students’ basic assumptions and the very terms
of the discussion. He challenged their reasons behind their assumptions. He
asked them to consider different viewpoints, then asked where those viewpoints
came from and what they were based on. He took nothing for granted.
Socrates might have eagerly joined the conversation at Chris’s dinner party
when it turned to the political gridlock that afflicts Washington. One guest
groused about the glacial pace of government, noting that America will fall
further behind if it continues to move so slowly when the world moves so fast.
But then another guest observed that “slow” was baked into our system thanks to
our Founding Fathers and their checks and balances. Slow protects us from the
impetuous or from over-reaction. Yes, someone else said, but it also prevents us
from keeping up with the competition. Then other questions followed: Does
anyone really want “fast”? Is there a difference between “fast” and “efficient”?
Why can’t we be efficient?
If Socrates had been there, we might still be going. Hang on, he might have
said, let’s talk about “slow government.”
Dostları ilə paylaş: