parties. Also, the contract notices are not always
published on the PPRC web. The current legislation
ensures that the process must be transparent, how-
ever, there is a lack of mechanisms that ensure easy
access or one has to work through the Review Bod-
45 RIINVEST 2012, “Improving Transparency and Governance of
public funds in Kosovo”
ies or courts. Electronic procurement solves many
of these issues. The instructions for application are
embedded in the system and troubleshooting in the
application process becomes less costly. There is also
less room for the procurement officials to illegitimate-
ly favor certain applicants by giving information not
available to all. Electronic auctioning can also be used
as a way to increase transparency and get the best
value for taxpayer money. Electronic procurement
makes the entire process more transparent by mak-
ing information more readily accessible and leaving
less discretion to procurement officials. It also makes
it more efficient, as a European Commission report
46
finds “Public entities that have already implemented
e-procurement report savings of between 5% and
20% of their procurement expenditure”.
Unclear guidelines on the procurement process are
another source of uncertainty that businesses face in
bidding for public funds and holding accountable the
procuring agency for fair treatment. Riinvest study
47
finds that “companies complain that tendering pro-
cedures and paperwork is very complicated and
sometimes they get disqualified due to non-com-
pliance with the requirements”. The ambiguity on
requirements makes the whole process less trans-
parent as illegitimately favored companies are given
inside information which other bidders do not have
access to. In light of this, Civil Society Organizations
have advocated for more spending in making sure the
public officials are properly trained and the informa-