15
ples of professional conduct and ethics. In
addition,
they neither serve the common good nor do they pro-
vide better information to the public,
thus affecting
negatively the justice system in the country.
19
The forth problem deals with access to records. It is
generally very difficult for citizens in Kosovo to ob-
tain justice system records. In 2013, Justice and the
People Campaign noticed that EULEX and the State
Prosecutor do not provide
access to indictments in
criminal cases in a timely manner. Access to indict-
ments serves transparency since the indictment is an
official act of the
State Prosecutor and courts, and it
presents charges being made against plaintiffs in the
name of the people of Kosovo.
20
In addition, numer-
ous judges do not allow
filming of court hearings, ex-
cluding, in this way, citizens from judicial proceedings
to which they are entitled to and violating the Kosovo
Criminal Procedure Code.
21
Lack
of indictments leads
to ambiguity since the press does not have all the in-
formation needed to provide the citizens with so that
they can evaluate the way the
state is carrying out its
responsibilities and how it is exercising its power.
The fifth problem that judiciary in Kosovo faces is the
nontransparent way of allocating cases among judg-
es and prosecutors.22 The
allocation of cases is not
actually done based on a well explained procedure or
objective criteria. As a result,
opportunities are creat-
ed for political interference in the selection of judges
and prosecutors.
23
This has led to many cases where
judges were actually ruling the cases of family mem-
bers or acquaintances.
The sixth problem derives
from the fact that Kosovo
Dostları ilə paylaş: