www.ielts-simon.com Compiled and organized by Toshev 13
“Artists” essay Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the
idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both
governments and other sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public
spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues
and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks
represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks
or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to
produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and
attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason
for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be
spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are
vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a
luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should
therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support,
but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.
(262 words, band 9)