www.ielts-simon.com
Compiled and organized by Toshev
1
“CCTV” essay
In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime,
but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.
Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?
It is true that video surveillance has become commonplace in many cities in recent years. While I
understand that critics may see this as an invasion of privacy, I believe that the benefits
do outweigh the
drawbacks.
There are two main reasons why people might disapprove of the use of video cameras in public places.
The first objection is that these cameras invade our privacy, in the sense that we are constantly being
watched by the authorities or by private security firms. Many people find this
intrusive and feel that the
recording of their movements is a form of state control that curtails their individual freedom. The second
argument against the proliferation of CCTV cameras is that they are being used as an alternative to police
officers patrolling the streets. If this is
indeed happening, then it is unlikely
that members of the public
will feel safer.
In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I believe that the use of video cameras to monitor public
areas is a positive measure. The key objective of video surveillance is to deter criminals and to prevent
crime. For example, petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets are less likely
to operate in parts of
cities where they know that they are being watched. At the same time, when crimes are committed, the
police can use video evidence to catch and prosecute offenders. Therefore, in my view, video cameras
offer valuable support to police officers, and they make cities safer for inhabitants, workers and visitors
alike.
In conclusion, it seems to me that we gain more than we lose from the enhanced security that CCTV
cameras bring to our cities.
(275 words, band 9)
