Science and Education in Karakalpakstan issn 2181-9203 Science Magazine chief editor

Ключевые слова: 
художественный, научный, образ, образность, концепция, 
эстетический идеал, портрет, пейзаж, персонаж, национальность, психика, духовная 
интерпретация, сюжет, путевой образ. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

---

Science and Education in Karakalpakstan. 2023 №2/1 ISSN 2181-9203 
246 
PROBLEMS OF QUALIFYING FORGERY JOB TITLE CRIME 
Nawrızbaev S.K. 
Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh 
 
Summary: 
In conclusion, the crime of forgery is not a symptom of some form of theft of 
property. It is a piecemeal crime that encroaches on its independent object. For this reason, the 
method of using the forgery of office in the robbery of other people's property, after the completion 
of the crime of forgery and theft of the property of others, regardless of whether it was done in the 
process of its implementation or before its implementation, the actions of the accused should be 
qualified according to the set of articles on forgery of office and robbery of other people's property. 
Keywords:
 position, evidence, qualification, crime, order, article. 
Qualifying the forgery position is carried out according to certain rules. The rules for 
qualifying the forgery position are the ways and methods provided for in the application of the 
criminal law, the orders of the Plenums of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, as 
well as the ways and methods created in other judicial practice and the theory of criminal law. 
L. D. Gauxman divided the rules used in qualifying the forgery evidence in a criminal case 
into three groups: general, personal and special rules [1]. The specific features of qualifying forgery 
position and distinguishing it from structurally similar crimes are based on these rules. 
Position forgery as an independent crime is rarely seen. Its danger lies mainly in the fact that 
it is usually combined with other crimes, first of all, with the crime of robbing other people’s 
property by using the position [2]. 
Although the Criminal Code enumerates different ways of robbing other people’s property 
according to the form of work, a single link has not yet been created when comparing property 
damage and forgery to the criminal-legal assessment. At the same time, there are two main points of 
view in the theory of criminal law regarding the qualification of such crimes. 
Proponents of the first point of view, if employed as a way of facilitating or concealing 
forgery and any other crime, including the plundering of the property of others, considers that the 
entire act should be qualified by the summary of the articles of the Criminal Code, which stipulate 
responsibility for these offenses [3]. 
According to the second proponents’ point of view, if the forgery position is left as a method 
or means of plundering the property of others, then it must be covered by the last mentioned crime 
and therefore does not require additional qualification [4]. Forgery position or the use of forged 
documents did not determine the direct transfer of other people’s property to certain persons, rather, 
we can see that only when this goal is a means of concealing the traces of a crime, the combination 
of crimes - theft of someone else’s property and the crime of forgery position committed in a 
specific way [5]. 
However, supporters’ point of view that this composition of the forgery crime is covered by 
the composition of the robbery of other people’s property give arguments that are not relevant to the 
meaning of the issue under consideration [6]. In order to solve it correctly, it is necessary to follow 
the general rules of qualification according to the totality of crimes. According to him, in the event 
that the accused has actually committed two independent crimes provided for in different articles of 
each criminal law, responsibility for the set of crimes is canceled only if one of the secondary acts is 
a constitutional sign of the composition of the other crime of dangerous aggression. 
It is known that the forgery position is not considered a sign of some form of the crime of 
looting other people’s property. It is a crime that attacks its independent object. For this reason, the 
method of using the forgery position in the robbery of other people’s property, regardless of 

---