There is a growing demand from patients and referring physicians for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive
cardiac procedures are technically unique from conventional cardiac procedures and require a thorough understanding
of the surgical, anesthetic, and perfusion strategies. Strategies include routine use of augmented venous drainage,
alternative arterial and venous cannulation sites, and special cannulas designed for minimally invasive procedures. The
following review describes the strategies and safety systems that should be considered when performing minimally
Shann and Melnitchouk
147
Unlike a roller arterial pump (pictured in Figure 1), if a
centrifugal arterial pump is used during VAVD, there is a
risk of air entrainment via the hollow-fiber membrane
oxygenator.
18
Air can be transmitted across the fibers of
the oxygenator if the RPMs of the centrifugal pump are
lowered to the point where flow is reversed and negative
pressure is imparted to the oxygenator. Incorporating a
1-way flow valve in the tubing between the venous reser-
voir and the oxygenator will prevent retrograde flow and
the risk of negative pressure.
17
Reports have illustrated that air entrained through the
venous line of the CPB circuit
gets through the reservoir,
oxygenator, and arterial filter and can be detected in the
arterial line.
19-21
In the setting of venous air entrainment,
relative to gravity drainage, VAVD has been shown to
increase the rate of entrainment and total number of gas-
eous microemboli.
22
Therefore, in the setting of venous air
entrainment, VAVD should be minimized by minimizing
the level of negative pressure. More important, every effort
should be made to eliminate the source of any venous air.
CAVD is another method of augmenting venous drain-
age. This strategy may be considered more complicated
than VAVD because it requires the perfusionist to operate
2 centrifugal pumps simultaneously. CAVD utilizes a sec-
ond centrifugal pump that is placed in the venous line of
the CPB circuit and is therefore also more expensive. The
centrifugal pump creates negative pressure at the inlet and
actively augments venous flow. As with VAVD, CAVD in
the setting of venous air entrainment has been shown to
increase the volume of emboli; however, it has been sug-
gested that CAVD breaks the emboli into smaller emboli
and allows for easier passage through the CPB circuit.
23
The advantages of CAVD include the absence of the risks
inherent to VAVD—namely, reservoir pressurization and
oxygenator air entrainment. CAVD also provides the
option to use a soft shell venous reservoir that has been
shown in some studies to reduce blood activation and
improve patient outcome.
24,25
In summary, we recommend the following to safely aug-
ment venous return during minimally invasive procedures:
•
• VAVD with an approved vacuum regulator—for
example, Boehringer model 3930;
•
• total negative pressure (gravity + applied vacuum)
should not be less than −100 mm Hg;
•
• use the minimum amount of applied negative pres-
sure to achieve the desired flow;
•
• monitor venous reservoir positive and negative
pressure with visual and audible alarms;
•
• when using a centrifugal arterial pump, incorporate
a 1-way flow valve between the venous reservoir
and oxygenator; and
•
• eliminate venous air entrainment in all clinical situ-
ations, especially during VAVD.
Figure 1. Schematic of VAVD and CAVD.
Abbreviations: VAVD, vacuum assisted-venous drainage; CAVD, centrifugal-assisted venous drainage.
at UNIV MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON on August 28, 2014
scv.sagepub.com
Downloaded from