developed nations is made up of women. It is believed that corporations should
be asked to designate a certain portion of high-level roles for females. This
essay completely disagrees with this statement because selecting employees
should be based on merit, and companies need to focus on profit.
The main reason is that candidates should be selected according to meritocracy.
This is to say that employees should be recruited for their work experience, their
qualifications and their soft skills, rather than their gender. In other words, the
high-profile positions should be given to the candidates who deserve them the
most. For example, if a man and a woman apply for the same position, a woman
should not have a priority over a man, but a fair selection on merit should be
conducted to find out who is the most suitable person for the advertised role,
considering skills, abilities and knowledge.
Another reason why I disagree is that the main goal for companies is profit. This
is to say that if a company wants to thrive, it needs to have the best possible
employees which are not necessarily one gender or the other. If companies were
to select staff members on gender, they could end up putting at risk the smooth
running of the business and causing financial losses. Therefore, choices should
be made by the human resources team only by bearing in mind which candidate
would be an asset for the business. For example, in Italy soccer teams are
almost exclusively run by men because they usually know more about this
business.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that companies should not be asked to allocate
a certain number of executive positions to women because candidates should be
selected considering merit, and profit is the top priority for a business.
Dostları ilə paylaş: