Conclusion.
Physical education curriculum content design and supporting
documentation for teachers in Ireland has evolved considerably over the last number of
decades. However, aligned with these changes are the continuing challenges which
teachers face in implementing these curricular changes such as not enough curriculum
time, poor or inadequate facilities and resources, lack of time for pre-service and in-
service education and the variety of contextual factors facing teachers within and
between schools. For many reasons, least of all the current economic climate, there is a
lack of investment in physical education by the government on a number of fronts, most
importantly investment in the professional development continuum for pre-service to
retirement for primary school teachers. Research needs to be carried out to establish
which types of professional development teachers require and in what aspects of
delivery of the physical education curriculum. Further research, on how best to provide
this professional development, taking into account the barriers and challenges that
remain in schools for the foreseeable future also needs to be addressed. We need to
establish which professional development programmes provide the most positive
outcomes, taking into account the challenges, imposed internally and externally, that
face teachers in their work. This study is a step towards adding to this research field.
Now that a picture of the context for undertaking professional development in Ireland
has been presented, the literature on professional development needs to be examined to
establish what professional development is and in turn professional development in
physical education and how best it can be facilitated and evaluated.
43
Professional development in Ireland.
Developing teachers across the professional life-cycle has become a policy
priority in many countries as can be seen from the Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD) report ‘Teachers Matter’ (Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005). Prior to designing any professional
development programme, it is important to examine the professional development that
already exists in that context (Wayne, Suk Yoon, Zhu, Cronen & Garet, 2008) and what
professional development the teachers may have experienced in the past. Many types of
professional development exist and are available to primary teachers in Ireland.
Teachers in the study school may be participating in other professional development in
subject or topic areas and this ‘ambient PD’ (Wayne et al., 2008, p. 473) may pervade
the context in which the study is taking place. Although in the study school the chance
of interference with the professional development programme under study is low and
does not share common elements it is important to be aware of their existence. In order
to understand the needs of teachers further, an overview of professional development
for Irish primary teachers is required.
In Ireland the importance of developing teachers was highlighted as early as
1967,
it is now generally recognised that the training of all categories of teachers
cannot be regarded as concluded as the end of the normal training
period…refresher courses must be regarded as an essential feature of the general
provision for teacher training. (Government of Ireland, 1967, p. 235)
Collinson and colleagues (2009) point out that for far too long, ITE has appeared to be
the ‘end rather than the beginning’ (p. 10) of a teachers learning. Internationally,
educating teachers to the level that is required for a knowledge society, ‘is seen as
something that needs to happen over a number of years, extending well beyond the
initial professional education phase, and which encompasses a wide variety of
knowledge and experiences in supportive contexts’ (Conway et al., 2009, p. xiv). The
stages of a teacher’s career demands different supports, therefore initial teacher
education, induction and career long learning need to be inter-connected to create a
more coherent learning environment for teachers and it needs to be integrated into a
supportive framework (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,
2005). In preparation for the 1993 National Development Plan, the DES sought over 35
million euro from the European Union (EU) fund to invest in teacher development, with
44
emphasis on improving management capacity particularly at school level (Sugrue,
2002) and a further 10 million was secured from the EU for the expansion and
development of Education Centres. Recommendations were also made for future
teacher developments; the establishment of a Teaching Council and the implementation
of pilot induction/mentoring programmes (Killeavy & Murphy, 2006).
The continuum of teacher education has traditionally been referred to
internationally as the “three I’s” of initial teacher education, induction and in-
career development. The council is adopting another set of “three I’s”, namely
innovation, integration and improvement which should underpin all stages of the
continuum. (Teaching Council, 2010a, p. 8)
What is needed at each stage of the continuum will vary but what is vital is that
the different parts of the continuum should not function in isolation from the others
(Travers, 2006). Sugrue and colleagues (2001) insist that policy lags behind provision,
a belief also to be found in Hardman (2008), ‘the crux of the issue is that there is too
much of a gap between the promise and reality’ (p. 15). The Irish National Teachers’
Organisation (INTO) (2004a) argued that policies and legislation in education will not
enhance primary education in Ireland unless accompanied by commitments to allocate
resources to the sector. This is particularly important for physical education where lack
of resourcing is a major barrier to the implementation of physical education. There is
the added issue in Ireland, whereby even if resources and infrastructure were available,
the decentralised autonomy of education, whereby principals and boards of management
are having increased autonomy in the finance and management of schools, may lead to
further challenges if leadership in schools is lacking (Hogan, Brosnan, DeRóiste,
MacAlister, Quirke-Bolt & Smith, 2007). Without the support of the principals for
physical education and an understanding of its value, physical education will not
achieve its potential in schools.
Coolahan (2007) writes that professional development was first given priority in
the seventies, in Ireland, with the establishment of the regional Teacher Centres. Over
the next twenty years the early momentum was lost due to economic difficulties and
policy decisions (Coolahan, 2004). Coolahan (2003) saw the mid-nineties as a
landmark in the historical development of continuing professional development
in terms of acceptance by national government of its importance, putting in
place an in career development unit (ICDU, now known as the Teacher
Education Section - TES) to co-ordinate and promote it and the increased
investment devoted to it. (p. 33-34)
45
Sugrue (2002; 2003) reports that in-service professional development is
‘inadequate and poorly conceived due to lack of differentiation, that is sensitive to
context and career stage’ and that it is ‘fragmented and lacking in
coherence’ (p. 211).
There are no annual minimum professional development requirements for teachers in
Ireland (Coolahan, 2007) and the Teaching Council (Teaching Council, 2010b) have
admitted that when professional development courses are taken, the focus has often
been on system reform rather than school or teacher needs. Although there has been an
increase in the amount of in-school professional development, most professional
development has taken place outside of school hours (Coolahan, 2003)
.
According to
best practice, the Teaching Council (2010b) state that time should be built into the
normal work schedule of the teacher without compromising the school calendar. There
is, however, constant pressure and concern from school management and principals that
professional development should not ‘erode the teaching-learning year for pupils’
(Coolahan, 2003, p. 39).
The Teaching Council (2010b) recognises that ‘teacher beliefs and practices are
circumscribed by the prevailing culture’ (p. 26) and they insist that there is a
‘prevalence of professional insulation and isolation’ (p. 26). Hogan and colleagues
(2007) noted a strong reluctance when it comes to sharing positive innovations with
colleagues, for fear that they would look like they were ‘showing off, or as setting a
standard that would show the work of colleagues in a poor light, or as attempting to
advance their own careers at the expense of colleagues’ (p. 34). This does not help in
the current climate where future policy is directing that professional development is to
be supported by teacher communities of learning (TCL), operating through the
Education Centres. According to Clancy and colleagues (1994) ‘there should be a
variety of forms of in-service teacher education’ and this should include ‘an emphasis
on school-based in-service provision and such courses should embrace ‘the personal and
professional needs of the teacher’ (p. 87).
Dostları ilə paylaş: |