Tezislər / Theses

THE 3
rd
 INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES OF STUDENTS AND YOUNG RESEARCHERS 
dedicated to the 99
th
anniversary of the National Leader of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev
32
Fig.2.
Comparison of Sw values obtained from different models for reservoirs V and 
VII horizons 
Thus, it can be concluded that the choice of an appropriate petrophysical 
model for calculating the reservoir water saturation coefficient is of significant 
importance, which directly affects the volume and reserves of the estimated 
reservoir. 
References
 
1. Asquith, G., Krygowski D., (2004). Basic well log analysis (second edition). AAPG Methods 
in Exploration 16, 244 p. 
2. Archie, G. E., (1942). The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir 
characteristics. Transactions of the AIME, 146(01), pp. 54-62. 
3. Waxman, M.H., and Smits, L.J.M, (1968). Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly 
sands.SPE journal. 
4. Clavier, C., G. Coates, and J. Dumanoir, (1977). Theoretical and experimental bases for 
the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 
Annual Meeting, paper SPE-6859. 
5. Simandoux, P., (1963). Mesures dielectriques en milieu poreux, application a mesure des 
saturations en eau: Etude du Comportement des Massifs Argileux, Revue de l’institut 
Francais du Petrole, Supplementary Issue. 
6. Poupon, A., & Leveaux, J., (1971). Evaluation of water saturation in shaly formations. 
Transactions, SPWLA. 
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1
2
3
SW
Number of Reservoirs
Zone V
SwArc
SwD
W
SWmin=0.38
SWmax=0.47
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
SW
Number of Reservoirs
Zone VII
SWmin=0.33
SWmax=0.37

---