3. Present and discuss the new vocabulary by using different
techniques such as pictures, realia, and mime, direct
questions in order
to focus on pronunciation, repetition, and meaning. Then write the new words on the board, to
reinforce spelling.
4. Give a scenario to students to perform (designed and arranged by researcher) about the topic discussed earlier in
the class. Ask them
to deliver meaning in short, simple, transactional and interpersonal conversation to interact with
their surroundings, involving the new vocabulary and functions used in the lesson. As examples of speech acts: ask for,
give, or refuse a favour, accept and reject things, admit and deny, and ask for and give opinions.
5. Ask students to learn about the scenario several days before performance activity.
6. Divide the class into groups of students, consisting of five or six girls per group.
7. Explain and give instructions to achieve communication competence and timing.
8. Select a group of students and ask them to play the prepared scenario
9. Observe and monitor the scenario being performed
10. Discuss and evaluate each group's performance.
Instrument
The researcher developed an achievement test based on the instructional material of the English book “Flying High”.
The aim of preparing the test was to achieve the following objectives: (1) measuring the effectiveness of using role-play
in enhancing female students' vocabulary competence and accuracy compared to the traditional methods and (2)
providing data about the students’ vocabulary progress before and after the study. Both groups, the experimental group
and the control group, were taught by the same teacher.
The test contained 42 items divided into three main parts which tested vocabulary. Students were asked to choose the
correct words to fill in the blanks in conversation; they had to match some words with their meanings; they were also
asked to write the spelling of the relevant word under each of a set of pictures (14.14.14 respectively). Each item scored
one mark. The final question was a multiple choice question with 8 items. The total score was out of 50 points.
A t-test was conducted at the start of this programme to make sure that there were no significant differences between
the control group and the experimental group in their prior knowledge of English vocabulary.
Validity and Reliability
To confirm that the achievement test measures what it is mainly designed to measure, it was evaluated by a panel of
experts in educational studies and EFL Specialists. Their recommendations and comments were carefully considered.
Test questions were reformed according to their suggestions. Moreover,
prior to the main study, a pilot study was
conducted, with a group of 20 students who were excluded from the sample, to check the reliability of the pretest and
posttests. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for all the questions. The total value for the pretest was (0.80), while the
alpha value for the posttest was (0.83), which indicates that the questions were highly reliable.
Data Analysis
Following the implementation
of the pretest and post-test, the of scores were calculated and analysed by using the
SPSS for Windows version 17. The mean and independent sample t-test were used to compare the mean scores of the
two groups.
III.
R
ESULTS AND
A
NALYSIS
Regarding the results obtained from the pretest to ensure the equivalence and homogeneity of the two groups of
participants in terms of vocabulary performance before starting the treatment, the results are revealed in table 1
T
ABLE
1
D
ESCRIPTIVE
S
TATISTICS RESULT OF PRE
-
TEST
Dostları ilə paylaş: