"The Unbearable Lightness Of Being" By Milan Kundera
150
no one in the entire nation agreed with the occupation regime, the Russians had to
ferret out the few exceptions and push them into power. But where could they look? All
faith in Communism and love for Russia was dead. So they sought people who wished
to get back at life for something, people with revenge on the brain. Then they had to
focus, cultivate, and maintain those people's aggressiveness,
give them a temporary
substitute to practice on.
The substitute they lit upon was animals.
All at once the papers started coming out with cycles of features and organized letters-
to-the-editor campaigns demanding, for example, the extermination of all pigeons within
city limits. And the pigeons would be exterminated. But the major drive was directed
against dogs. People were still disconsolate over the catastrophe of the occupation, but
radio, television, and the press went on and on about dogs:
how they soil our streets
and parks, endanger our children's health, fulfill no useful function, yet must be fed.
They whipped up such a psychotic fever that Tereza had been afraid that the crazed
mob would do harm to Karenin. Only after a year did the accumulated malice (which
until then had been vented, for the sake of training, on animals) find its true goal:
people. People started being removed from their jobs, arrested, put on trial. At last the
animals could breathe freely.
Tereza kept stroking Karenin's head, which was
quietly resting in her lap, while
something like the following ran through her mind: There's no particular merit in being
nice to one's fellow man. She had to treat the other villagers decently, because
otherwise she couldn't live there. Even with Tomas, she was
obliged
to behave lovingly
because she needed him. We can never establish with
certainty what part of our
relations with others is the result of our emotions—love, antipathy, charity, or malice—
and what part is predetermined by the constant power play among individuals.
True human goodness, in all its purity and freedom, can come to the fore only when its
recipient has no power. Mankind's true moral test, its fundamental test (which lies
deeply buried from view), consists of its attitude towards those who are at its mercy:
animals. And in this respect mankind has suffered a fundamental debacle, a debacle so
fundamental that all others stem from it.
One of the heifers had made friends with Tereza. The heifer would
stop and stare at her
with her big brown eyes. Tereza knew her. She called her Marketa. She would have
been happy to give all her heifers names, but she was unable to. There were too many
of them. Not so long before, forty years or so, all the cows in the village had names.
(And if having a name is a sign of having a soul, I can say that they had souls despite
Descartes.) But then the villages were turned into
a large collective factory, and the
cows began spending all their lives in the five square feet set aside for them in their
cow sheds. From that time on, they have had no names and become mere
Dostları ilə paylaş: