On Knowing Humanity Journal
7(1), January 2023
Gil,
Book Review
50
Book Review
Irreversible Damage:
The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters
By Abigail Shrier
Reviewed by Vincent E. Gil
Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing
2020
I first came across Abigail Shrier’s work when the
vitriol that encircled its prepublication in 2020 was
loudly heard. It was ugly; it was merciless; and it
ignored, as those feeling threatened often do, any
careful data collection or year’s worth of investigation
by Shrier. When the book was finally released the
acrimony persisted, with such as Barnes & Noble and
Amazon taking it off their websites—only to have it
1
Genspect.org was founded by parents who felt their children needed a wider range of treatment options and more evidence
based approaches for gender questioning children and young people.
https://genspect.org/position/
.
2
Perspectives by Laura Edwards-Leeper and Erica Anderson, interviewed by Daryn Ray for
The Washington Post.
“The Mental
Health Establishment is Failing Trans Kids.” November 24, 2021.
3
On Knowing Humanity Journal. “Editorial Policies,” Section: Focus and Scope.
https://okhjournal.org/index.php/okhj/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope
.
4
Lisa Littman, “Parent Reports of Adolescents and Young Adults Perceived to Show Signs of a Rapid Onset of Gender
Dysphoria.”
PLoS One,
13 (8) DOI: e0202330.
returned after much backlash from parents
1
and some
professional peers, all of whom felt she was telling
truth.
2
This review begins here because as a medical and
psychological anthropologist, as a specialist on
sexuality and gender, I believe Shrier’s work raises the
very questions that should engage us as anthropologists
and as Christians amidst cultural protests. As OKHJ
puts it, “to examine the underlying reasons for
humanity’s destructive behavior toward self, others . . .
and the role divine redemption and hope play in
human lived experience and practice.”
3
Shrier’s work circles back to earlier work by Lisa
Littman, who coined the term “rapid onset gender
dysphoria” to name a phenomenon she had noted,
then investigated—one that was quickly surpassing
statistical odds-ratios in gender identity problems
among tweens and adolescents.
4
Gender dysphoria
—a
severe and usually historical discomfort with one’s
biological sex—was dramatically increasing, from less
than 0.01 percent of the population and afflicting
almost exclusively males a decade ago, to groups of
young females, tweens, teens, in high schools and
colleges, “coming out” as “trans.” The U.S. prevalence
of adolescent gender dysphoria has increased by a
thousand-fold over the last decade. In 2016, natal
On Knowing Humanity Journal
7(1), January 2023
Gil,
Book Review
51
females accounted for 46 percent of reassignments
(surgeries); a year later it was 70 percent, according to
The Trevor Project.
5
Across the pond, the UK
reported in 2018 a 4,400 percent rise over prior
decades of children wanting gender change.
6
Shrier’s work investigates the reasons behind what
she has called a
wave of
social contagion
among the
young,
7
fueled by the social isolation of tweens and
teens today, their incessant consumption of social
media via smartphones, blogs, and web platforms, all
of which
encourages
and
makes it cool to be trans.
“If
you are a female,
and teen, it prompts you to deny
birth gender as a salvo for all that afflicts you and keeps
you not popular.” Shrier’s tome is an excellent
teleological exploration of the ways and means in
which the overarching social contagion she describes
repurposes media avenues by which adolescents cope
with their sense of self, isolation, and emotions, in the
internet saturated world of the 21
st
century.
Shrier is an investigative journalist and attorney.
She isn’t an anthropologist, but proceeds in her
investigations much as a social scientist would. Her
work has been called “unscientific” by those who
oppose what it concludes, this despite her clear and
early detailing of her methodology (which I address
below). She is verbal, graphic, and conclusive;
sometimes anecdotal; yet her findings corroborate
much of what Littman and others have also been
reporting, and what I myself have discovered through
my own anthropological and sexual scientific research.
The work combines well-researched unobtrusive
data and hundreds of interviews with parents, trans
persons, teachers, physicians, politicians, and gender
specialists, along with personal stories of informants: of
5
The Trevor Project.
https://www.thetrevorproject.org/public-education/
.
6
Gordon Rayner, “Minister Orders Inquiry into 4,000 Per Cent Rise in Children Wanting to Change Sex.”
The Telegraph
(September 16, 2018).
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/09/16/minister-orders-inquiry-4000-per-cent-rise-children-wanting/
.
7
I’ve likened it to a
culture bound syndrome
, a term borrowed from medical anthropology, where it means a combination of
symptoms that identifies a condition, all of which only occur within specific, bounded cultural spaces. I’m referring to the series
of social actions that affirm
expressive individualism
above any biological, social, or other designation; and which therefore are
symptomatic of a belief that you are your own (best) master; and that no other criterion matters as much. Consequently, “feeling
trans,” “not wanting to be one’s natal sex,” is sufficient to manifest distress despite no earlier history of gender disconnect. The
manifestation
deviates
from the usual behavior and beliefs of individuals in the culture. See Vincent E. Gil,
“A Christian’s Guide
through the Gender Revolution: Gender, Cisgender, Transgender, and Intersex”
(Cascade Books, 2021).
8
All quotes are from various sections of Shrier’s work as reported in the Kindle book edition.
9
APA. “Guidelines for Practice with Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming People.”
https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/transgender.pdf
.
the “craze” (her word) and its results; of mental health
profession’s “betrayal” of the Hippocratic Oath of
doing no harm
via gender affirming therapy, bypassed
guidelines, and “off label” hormone therapies. These,
sans longitudinal clinical research so necessary to
validate them.
Shrier also looks at the effects of media on the
young—particularly on GenZ and iGeners—and the
‘influencers’ who’ve achieved celebrity status in social
media by means of their gender transition. Like a
noble anthropologist (again, she’s not), Shrier dives
deep into her unobtrusive sources: social media
platforms, blogs, Instagram, TikTok, etc., to discover
how these facilitate trans thinking and offer advice. We
hear their mantras: “If you think you are trans, you are
(44).” “You can try out trans by using a binder to
flatten your breasts (46).” “Testosterone is
amazing
. It
may just solve all your problems. You don’t have to be
certain you’re trans to go on hormones (47).” Most
subversive are the posts and instructions on how to lie
to your parents; how to fake symptoms and pass
therapeutic tests of dysphoria by saying the “right
things.” Like those gatekeepers we anthropologists
identify in many social spaces, here influencers are
quick to reward those who elevate their platform’s
numbers. “If you’ve ever felt different, anxious, or
afraid, or felt like you don’t fit in, there’s a transgender
community ready to accept you and become your new
family” (50).
8
Perhaps to Shrier, the more insidious and
“reckless” (her word) part of this gender moment is the
new “affirmative care” standard of mental health that
has been adopted by most medical accrediting
associations for gender-diverse presenting youth.
9
On Knowing Humanity Journal
7(1), January 2023
Gil,
Book Review
52
Among these associations, the American Psychological
Association (APA) has mandated therapists
adopt
the
novel gender ideology themselves: these must
affirm
the patient’s self-diagnosis (which often means
bypassing
gender exploration therapy
, once the
standard for mental health evaluations of gender
conflicts.) Issues that surround affirmative therapy are
well explained by Shrier: denying gender exploration
therapy initially; ignoring other possible emotional
issues in the tween or adolescent that may be
contributing to the confounding of gender identity;
ignoring that for a good number of younger tweens and
teens, over 80% stop identifying as another gender as
they get older; ignoring the hesitation and pause of
many in the profession who—at a great personal and
professional cost—have questioned affirmative therapy
and a rapid move to hormonal transitions.
10
She isn’t
alone in her concerns.
11
Should You Read Shrier’s Work?
I’ve argued earlier in this journal that Christian
anthropologists—social, psychological, medical, mis-
sional—should be attentive and keen to engage social
issues and concerns as a means of bringing the lived
experience and practice of our subject to better light.
12
Such is especially relevant in the arena of gender today.
Moreover, the church is not immune to the tsunami of
gender change that now accosts young persons, here
and in developed countries especially. Neither are
missional families immune.
13
Just as we’ve seen with
other sexual issues (homosexuality, bisexuality,
involvement in porn, sexual abuse), sexual
and gender
conflicts will also emerge as our young continuously
experience a fractured world and internet dependency,
all which Shrier so deftly delineates.
The problematic of sex and gender as rendered
today beckons anthropological inquiry. Christian
anthropologists are in a favored position to also bridge
the understanding of socially destructive behaviors
10
Darin Ray. op. cit.
11
Emily Bazelon. “The Battle Over Gender Therapy.”
The New York Times
(June 15) 2022.
12
Vincent E. Gil. 2022. “Wither Biological Sex: The Gender Takeover. A Position Paper.”
On Knowing Humanity Journal
6(1):
42-61.
13
See Dwight P. Baker and Robert J. Priest. 2014. “The Missionary Family: Witness, Concerns, Care.”
Evangelical Missiological
Society Series. William Carey Library. Note especially Part Three: “Forum on Sexual Orientation and Missions: An Evangelical
Discussion,” pp. 205–293.
with the hope divine redemption can play in human
outcomes. Shrier isn’t arguing from a religious
platform, but she will resonate with Christians—
Christian academics in sociology, anthropology,
psychology, theology, missions—as well as clergy and
those who are parents. Put aside your academic
persnicketies and yes, agree she isn’t an anthropologist
doing an investigation on a sociocultural phenomenon.
But do also agree she does a great deal of credible
work in providing clarity to the issues she explores.
Even if you don’t have academic interests that align
here, but you
do have family
, have
adolescents
,
grandkids
, as Shrier also asks, “I invite you to read this
dangerous book and decide for yourself”! (Foreword,
xvii).
Vincent (Vince) E. Gil is Professor Emeritus of
Medical Anthropology/Human Sexuality and
Epidemiology at Vanguard University. Dr. Gil
holds a Ph.D. in Anthropology from UCLA; a
postdoctoral in sexual medicine and therapy from
the Masters & Johnson Institute/Institute for
Reproductive Biology, St. Louis; and a second
postdoctoral from the School of Public Health,
UCLA, in epidemiology of infectious diseases with
emphasis on HIV/AIDS. He is an awarded Fellow
of the American Academy of Clinical Sexology. As
On Knowing Humanity Journal
7(1), January 2023
Gil,
Book Review
53
Professor Emeritus, Dr. Gil continues to research,
train, and write. His most recent work,
A
Christian’s Guide through the Gender Revolution
(Cascade, 2021) assists Christian parents, pastors,
therapists, and individuals in understanding the
‘gender moment’. His nonprofit,
Faith and Sex
Science
, continues to engage with counseling,
training, and information for Christian institutions.
Dr. Gil’s website is
http://drvincegil.com
, and he
can still be reached through the email below.
Author email:
vgil@vanguard.edu
Dostları ilə paylaş: |