ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW
OF PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
EFFLUENTS ANALYSIS
C l a i r e F a u s t i n e
Master of Science Thesis
Stockholm 2008
Abstract
The present report deals with environmental issues in refineries and petrochemical processes.
More precisely gaseous, liquid and solid effluents from processes are analysed qualitatively
and quantitatively when possible. Techniques to treat these effluents are reviewed or proposed
when lacking and methods to do not produce these effluents are envisaged.
In the part A of the report general effluents that are released from all types of processes are
studied. These effluents include fugitive emissions, flue gases from process heaters,
blowdown systems emissions and wastewaters. Fugitive emissions, one of the greatest
sources of VOCs can be qualified and quantified by the average emission factor approach and
reduced thanks to the implementation of an LDAR program. Flue
gases from process heaters,
which are a major source of NOx, SOx and particulate matters can be characterized with
emission factors and several techniques exist to treat or prevent these emissions. Concerning
blowdown systems emissions, which are difficult to quantify, methods to minimize these
emissions are given. Finally, wastewaters treatment in petroleum industry is shortly described
before best management practices and pollution prevention methods are enounced.
In the part B of the report four families of processes are studied: naphtha hydrotreatment,
naphtha isomerization, catalytic reforming and hydrogenation in olefin plants. Each of these
processes
is firstly described, the process flow diagram is explained and continuous and
intermittent effluents are characterized. In addition to general effluents dealt with in part A, it
has been found that processes can produce other effluents such as dioxins in isomerization or
catalytic reforming units or green oils during catalyst regeneration operations.
ii
List of Tables
Table A-2-1: Comparison of available techniques for NOx control for process heaters
Table A-2-2: Comparison of SOx-removal techniques
Table B-1-1: Typical properties of crude oil distillation naphtha
Table B-1-2: Typical properties of naphtha hydrotreating products
Table B-2-1: Typical properties of isomerisation naphtha feed
Table B-3-1: Typical properties of two charges for catalytic reforming unit
Table B-4-1: Typical
composition of a raw C
3
cut entering a selective hydrogenation unit
Table B-4-2: Compounds possibly present in catalyst regeneration effluents
Table B-4-3: Gaseous effluents during catalyst regeneration in C
3
selective hydrogenation
Table B-4-4: Gaseous effluents during catalyst oxidation in C
4
selective hydrogenation
Table B-4-5: Gaseous effluents during catalyst regeneration in GHU first reactor
Table B-4-6: Gaseous effluents during catalyst regeneration in GHU first reactor
Table B-4-7: Gaseous effluent during catalyst sulfurization in GHU
iii
List of Figures
Figure A-2-1:
Settling chamber
Figure A-2-2: Baffle chamber
Figure A-2-3: Cyclone
Figure A-2-4: Baghouse
Figure A-2-5: Wet scrubber
Figure A-4-1: Sour waters stripping system
Figure B-1-1: Naphtha hydrotreating process flow diagram
Figure B-1-2: Influents/effluents scheme for naphtha hydrotreating unit in normal operations
Figure B-1-3: Influents/effluents scheme for naphtha hydrotreating unit during catalyst
sulfiding
Figure B-1-4: Influents/effluents scheme for naphtha hydrotreating unit during catalysts
regeneration
Figure B-2-1: Simplified process flow diagram for isomerization with chlorinated Pt/Al
2
O
3
catalyst
Figure B-2-2: IPSORB
®
isomerization
process
Figure B-2-3: HEXORB
®
isomerization process
Figure B-2-4: Influents/effluents scheme for naphtha isomerisation unit in normal operations
Figure B-2-5: Influents/effluents scheme for naphtha isomerisation unit during dryers
regeneration
Figure B-2-6: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlordibenzodioxin
Figure B-3-1: Simplified scheme of semi-regenerative process for catalytic reforming
Figure B-3-2: Continuous catalyst regeneration reforming
Figure B-3-4: Influents/effluents scheme for catalytic reforming reaction section
Figure B-3-5: Simplified process flow diagram for CCR regeneration section
Figure B-3-6: Influents/effluents scheme for catalytic reforming in regeneration section
Figure B-4-1: Flow sheet of the C
3
selective
hydrogenation process
Figure B-4-2: Flow sheet of the C
4
selective hydrogenation process
Figure B-4-3: Flow sheet of the gasoline hydrogenation process
Figure B-4-5: Influents/effluents scheme for C
3
selective hydrogenation during normal
operations
Figure B-4-6: Influents/effluents scheme for C
4
selective hydrogenation during normal
operations
Figure B-4-7: Influents/effluents scheme for gasoline hydrogenation during normal operations
Figure B-4-8: Influents/effluents scheme for C
3
selective hydrogenation during catalyst
reduction or reactivation
Figure B-4-9 Influents/effluents
scheme for C
4
selective hydrogenation during catalyst
reduction, reactivation or stripping
iv
List of Acronyms
API-
American Petroleum Institute
BOOS-
Burner Out Of Service
CCR-
Continuous Catalytic Reforming
CO-
Carbon
Monoxide
CO
2
-
Carbon
Dioxide
DMDS- Dimethyl
Disulfur
EPA-
United States Environmental Protection Agency
ETBE-
Ethyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether
FCC-
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
FG-
Fuel
Gas
FGR-
Flue Gas Recirculation
FO-
Fuel
Oil
GHU-
Gasoline Hydrogenation Unit
HAP-
Hazardous Air Pollutant
HC-
Hydrocarbon
LDAR-
Leak Detection And Repair
LEA-
Low
Excess Air
LNB-
Low NO
x
Burner
LPG-
Liquefied Petroleum Gas
MA-
Methyl
Acetylene
MTBE-
Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether
NO
x
-
Nitrogen
Oxide
NO
2
-
Nitrogen
dioxide
OFA-
Over Fire Air
PD-
Propadiene
PCDD- Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
PCDF-
Polychlorodibenzo-p-furan
PM-