141
the verb make up the category of voice
in the verbs of the Uzbek
language.
According to the given theoretical interpretation “the causative
voice” given in the grammars of the Uzbek language
is not included in
the system of the category of voice in the verbs , because by the
addition of the affixal morphemes of causation
the attitude of the
speaker towards his/her action or state is expressed ; the speaker’s
attitude towards his/her action or state may express obligation /
permission/persuasion/request/causation.
B.A.
Serebrennikov’s
opinion deserves to be mentioned in this case. He marks that
in Turkic
languages the verbs having the affixal morphermes of causation at
present do not correlate with the forms of the voice and it is possible
that these affixal morphemes have acquired a new and special function.
[11, p.68]
Analysis of the given above examples
shows that the definite
grammatical meaning expressed by zero morpheme in the structure of
the Uzbek language is depended on the
position of its usage, that is
what form of the word of the same class it is opposed to: 1. writeO(
present simple)-wrote(past simple); 2. ( we) writeO(active v.)- ( the
letter) was written(passive v.): the first writeO( with the zero
morpheme) expresses the category of tense, the second writeO( with
the zero morpheme) expresses the category of voice.
Verbs
open
and
burn
in the given above sentences (
the door
opened and the paper burned) express the action being performed in
the subject itself not being able to enter the binary opposition with the
form of the active voice ( here we see the existence of the meaning of
the middle voice, not having the form of expressing this meaning ( in
Russian: Дверь открылась, Бумага сгорела , in Uzbek:
Eshik och
il
di,
Qog’oz yondi ). In these English examples the meaning of the middle
voice is expressed lexically, that we can’t concider it to be used in the
middle voice form of the English verb.
In Russian:
Я одеваю ребенка( active voice)
Дом строит
Dostları ilə paylaş: