1. Tizim innovatori bo'lish Muharrir : Devid A. Bray (Emori universiteti, aqsh) Ishtirokchilar

ertangi dunyoni yarating.
Mashqlar
1. Siz 1900-yillarda mahalliy mahallangiz a'zolariga tashrif buyurish uchun o'tmishga qaytishingiz mumkin. Nima bo'lardi
Siz ular bilan baham ko'rgan "yangi" bilimmi? Qaysi yangiliklar siz uchun eng muhim va
nega?
2. Siz 2075 yilda o'z mahallangizga o'z vaqtida bora olasiz. Nimani tasavvur qilasiz?
hozirgi vaqt sayohatchisi, siz kuzatadigan kelajakdagi yangiliklardan ba'zilari bo'ladimi? Qanday bo'lardi
ular insoniyat jamiyatlarini o'zgartiradimi? Qaysi yangiliklar siz uchun eng muhimi va nima uchun?
3. Siz 500 000 abonent uchun yangi uyali aloqa tarmog'ini loyihalash uchun tizim innovatori sifatida ishga qabul qilingansiz. Siz
Uyali telefon tarmog'ining kelajakdagi o'sishi talabini shaxsga kiritish uchun etarlicha dono
qo'shimcha obunachilar. Tizimni loyihalashda yana qanday talablarni hisobga olish kerak?
Loyihalashtirilgan tizimning muvaffaqiyatiga (yoki muvaffaqiyatsizligiga) qanday talablar ta'sir qilishi mumkin?
4. Agar biron bir innovatsiyani loyihalash ustida ishlay olsangiz, u nima bo'lardi va nima uchun? Yangi narsa yaratasizmi
yoki mavjud tizimni kengaytirasizmi? Qaysi talablar va boshqa tashvishlarni hisobga olish kerak
innovatsiyangizni loyihalashtiryapsizmi? Sizningcha, agar siz o'z innovatsiyangizga erisha olsangiz, qanday foyda bo'lar edi
tasavvur qilyapsizmi?
Bo'lim muharriri
Devid A. Bray hozirda Emori universitetidagi Goizueta biznes maktabida PhD nomzodi. Uning tadqiqoti
shaxslararo bilimlarni rivojlantirish uchun "pastdan yuqoriga" (ya'ni, boshlang'ich) ijtimoiy-texnologik yondashuvlarga e'tibor beradi.
almashinuvlar. Akademiyadan oldin u bioterrorizmga tayyorgarlik va javob berish dasturi bo'yicha IT boshlig'i bo'lib ishlagan.
Kasalliklarni nazorat qilish markazlari, u erda u 11 sentyabr, kuydirgi, WNV, SARS va boshqalarga texnologik javobni boshqargan.
yirik epidemiyalar.
References
Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2000). Knowledge Transfer in Organizations:
Learning from the Experience of Others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 1-8.
Clippinger, J. H. (1999). The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise (1st ed). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global
Organization. Management Science, 50, 352-364.
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems. Academy of
Management Review, 9, 284-295.
21
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information
Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., Simmons, R. T., & Kragt, A. (1986). Organizing Groups for Collective Action. The
American Political Science Review, 80, 1171-1185.
Galbraith, J. R. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics.
Heckscher, C. C., & Donnellon, A. (Eds.). (1994). The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on
Organizational Change. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
Kling, R. (1991). Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work. Communications of the
ACM, 34, 83-88.
Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors IN Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly,
27, 197-235.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
Markus, M. (2001). Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors
in Reuse Success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 57-93.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5, 14-37.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. [Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness in
Asymmetric, Environmental Social Dilemmas: Explaining Harvesting Behavior and the Role of
Communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 111-126.