Reß ection on curriculum development
During the pre-writing stage, instead of giving a lot of guiding questions as support to writing,
students have to choose from a variety of information and construct their own writing. From an
interview of students, it was found that students answered the guiding questions in writing like
attempting comprehension questions. Thorough guidance to tackle the guiding questions prior to
writing task may hamper students’ motivation to construct their own ideas. Besides students need to
organize ideas and apply what they have learnt.
The speaking component in the pre-writing activities in terms of constructing vocabulary word-
web, pair/group discussion and the presentation of ideas in class provide suffi cient language input to
support students’ writing. To help students become familiar with the vocabulary and sentence pattern
needed for the writing tasks, opportunities are created for them to apply the knowledge in presenting
and writing the script. As students are required to take notes in the process of the pre-writing
activities, this encourages students to develop study skills. Since the process of discussion followed
by note-taking has given students ideas and input for the writing tasks, they have become more active
and confi dent in writing. Self-editing and peer corrections are conducted as post-writing activities. In
the process, students are required to proof-read their own writing as well as their peers’ writing. They
have seldom done that in the past but the self/peer editing is important to help students revise their
work.
As motivation and ability are twins and each reinforces the other, the support given to help
students write can raise their motivation. It is hoped that the learning and teaching materials designed
will lead to an improvement in students’ writing skills. When they see their improvement, their
motivation to write more will be boosted.
Merging of speaking and writing task would take up more time than the regular writing lesson. The
major constraints of limited time for preparing the learning and teaching materials as well as lesson
time would imply that there might be a revamp in the tight teaching schedule.
References
1. The Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English Language Curriculum Guide (Primary 1-6). HKSAR.
2. Florez, V., & Hadaway, N. L. (1987). Relationship of oral language proficiency and writing behaviours
of secondary second language learners. Paper presented at the Southwest Regional Conference of the
International Reading Association. (15th, Phoenix, AZ, January 22-24, 1987)