no incentive to manage their crops, since the U.S. government will buy any
surplus wheat. The question asks which choice weakens the claim that
removing the American subsidy would cause the price of wheat to rise.
(A) The fact that there are uses for wheat that is not eaten is irrelevant. This
does not address the farmers’ claims.
(B) That buyers of wheat can predict their needs in advance is irrelevant,
because the text indicates that American farmers do not pay attention to actual
demand for wheat.
(C) In this argument, the global market for soybeans is irrelevant to the global
market for wheat, which is a different commodity with different demand,
supply, and pricing structures.
Dostları ilə paylaş: