(B) CORRECT.
If the government were to succeed in this effort, there would
be somewhat less risk to travelers with compromised immune systems. This
would weaken the conclusion that such travelers should avoid the Mosquito
Coast. If the effort were to fail, it would produce no change in the danger to
such travelers. Either way, this answer choice does nothing to strengthen the
argument that such travelers should avoid the Mosquito Coast.
(C) Strengthens. Since a compromised immune system doesn’t effectively
fight either dengue fever or malaria, people with such immune systems are at
increased risk of infection by such diseases.
(D) Strengthens. The populations of both mosquitoes grow during rainy
season; thus, the chance of contracting either disease also grows.
(E) Strengthens. The insect repellent may be the most effective available, but
it can also have a terrible side effect. Using this repellent is one of the options
for dealing with the risk of mosquito-borne disease. Since this option is more
dangerous than before, the travel advisory is strengthened.
45.
(D).
According to the text, the Peruvian government claims that Inca Trail
treasures would have deteriorated without a new permit program that has
restricted the number of tourists. The correct answer will strengthen this
claim.
(A) Irrelevant. The increase in pay may have resulted from the permit
program, but there is no direct connection to preservation of the Inca Trail.
(B) Irrelevant. Local villages may have seen a drop in income as a result of
the restrictions on tourist numbers, but this does not strengthen or weaken the
claim that the permit program prevented Inca Trail ruins from deteriorating.
(C) Irrelevant. The funds are a positive result of the permit program, but if
these funds are used to protect or preserve archaeology elsewhere, then they
do not impact the preservation of ruins specifically on the Inca Trail.
Dostları ilə paylaş: