Absence of histological changes to the kidney in some cirrhotics with renal failure 1863: Absence of histological changes to the kidney in some cirrhotics with renal failure
Yüklə
0,84 Mb.
tarix
16.02.2017
ölçüsü
0,84 Mb.
#8616
1863: Absence of histological changes to the kidney in some
cirrhotics with renal failure
1863: Absence of histological changes to the kidney in some cirrhotics with renal failure
1956: 1st detailed description of the syndrome by Hecker and Sherlock
1960s: Reversal of renal failure with kidney transplant to patients with CKD
1970s: Reversal of HRS with liver transplantation
Functional renal failure
Functional renal failure
Absence of Histological changes
Occurs in patients with chronic liver disease
Progressive
liver failure and ascites
Can occur acutely in certain settings
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Large volume paracentesis without albumin
Marked renal vasoconstriction
Reduced GFR
Hepatorenal Syndrome is a severe complication of end stage liver disease associated with an 80%-95% mortality at 2 weeks.
Hepatorenal Syndrome is a severe complication of end stage liver disease associated with an 80%-95% mortality at 2 weeks.
The only interventions that have been shown to improve survival are liver transplantation and more recently the vasopressin analogues and TIPS
Type 1 (Acute)
Type 2 (Chronic)
Type 1
Type 1
Rapid decline in renal function
Doubling of serum Cr >132
or
reduction in 24h CrCl to <40ml/min
Less than 2 weeks
Spontaneous
Associated with SBP (20%) or large volume paracentesis w/o albumin (15%)
Type 2
Type 2
Slower decline in renal function
Criteria for type 1
HRS not met
Development of diuretic resistant or refractory ascites
Incidence
Incidence
7-10% in hospitalized cirrhotics with ascites
20% at 1 year, 40% at 5 years
Risk Factors
Advanced ascites (diuretic resistant)
Large volume paracentesis w/o albumin (15%)
SBP (20%)
Prognosis
Worst prognosis of all complications of cirrhosis
Type 1 median survival: <2 weeks
Type 2 median survival: ~6 months
Lack of specific testing
Lack of specific testing
Diagnosis of exclusion
Differential Diagnosis of renal failure in cirrhosis
Hypovolaemia (GI
hemorrhage
, shock)
Nephrotoxins (drugs, contrast)
Glomerulonephritis (Hep B and C)
Acute Tubular Necrosis
Obstruction
Major Criteria
Major Criteria
Chronic or acute liver disease with advanced liver failure or portal hypertension
Low GFR (Cr > 132mol/L OR CrCl < 40mL/min)
Exclusion of shock, ongoing bacterial infection, volume depletion,
and use of nephrotoxic drugs
No improvement in renal function despite stopping diuretics and volume repletion with 1.5L of saline
No proteinuria or ultrasonographic evidence of obstruction or parenchymal renal disease
Arroyo et al;
Hepatology
1996; 23: 164-76
Minor Criteria
Minor Criteria
Urine volume < 500mL/day
Urine sodium < 10mEq/L
Urine osmolality > plasma osmolality
Urine RBCs < 50 per hpf
Serum sodium < 130mEq/L
Arroyo et al;
Hepatology
1996; 23: 164-76
Splanchnic
arteriolar vasodilatation
Splanchnic arteriolar vasodilatation
– Decreased effective arterial volume (EAV)
– Decreased systemic vascular resistance
– Hypotension
– Activation of vasoconstrictor systems
Renin-Angiotensin Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System
Sympathetic Nervous System
Anti-Diuretic Hormone
Hyperdynamic circulation
Hyperdynamic circulation
Hypotension from reduced effective art vol
Low systemic vascular resistance (SVR)
Baroreceptor
activation
SNS activation leading to increased contractility
Increased cardiac output
Vasoconstrictors
Vasoconstrictors
Often combined with albumin
Vasopressin analogues (Terlipressin)
TIPS
Liver Transplantation
Synthetic vasopressin analogue
Synthetic vasopressin analogue
Most studied drug for treatment of HRS
Mechanism: V-1 receptor agonist
Splanchnic
vasoconstriction
Adverse events (arrhythmia, ischemia)
<5%
IV bolus dosing
Reduce portal hypertension
Reduce portal hypertension
Increase effective arterial volume
Reverse splanchnic vasodilatation
Complications
Encephalopathy
Shunt stenosis
Haemolysis
Hyperbilirubinaemia
Treatment
of choice for HRS
Treatment of choice for HRS
Limited by organ availability and mortality of HRS
Higher rate of complications:
– Higher post operative mortality
– More days in the ICU
– Increased need for post-op RRT (35% vs. 5% w/o HRS)
Improvement in renal function
– Increased GFR post-op vs. decline in non-HRS pts
– Lower overall GFR compared to non HRS pts
Thank You
Thank You
2>
Yüklə
0,84 Mb.
Dostları ilə paylaş:
Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət
gir
|
qeydiyyatdan keç
Ana səhifə
Stomatologiya
Anesteziologiya
Cərrahlıq
Ginekologiya
Tibb
yükləyin