ered healthy, nutritious, and safe. However, the modern
consumers. Fresh or processed meat and poultry
2
Economic Research Service/USDA
An Economic Assessment of Food Safety Regulations
required level of safety in the food products they market.
Even if firms were to attempt to provide food-safety
information through product labels, there may be some
concern from a consumer protection standpoint about
firms' making unsubstantiated health-risk claims in
labeling or advertising.
The lack of consumers’ food-safety information and the
lack of producers’ incentives to provide such information
lead to a market failure. The workings of a non-regulated
market may yield greater-than-optimal levels of patho-
gens in the food supply and excessive human-health
risk, which could result in higher levels of illness and
mortality from foodborne pathogens. In such a case, the
public welfare could be enhanced if society regulated the
food-processing industry to reduce the level of foodborne
pathogens and increased consumers’ knowledge, so
they could take action to reduce their risk of exposure to
foodborne illness.
The economic issue of concern is how best to achieve
the goal of a safer food supply. Although regulations
governing the production, processing, distribution, and
marketing of food products may create benefits by
increasing the safety level of the Nation’s food supply
and reducing risk of illness, these regulations can also
increase producers’ costs and potentially raise food
prices. The task is to ensure that the regulations maxi-
mize the net benefits of increasing food safety, equating
the marginal benefits of safer food with the marginal
costs of achieving food safety goals.
In the next section, we present a baseline estimate of the
extent of microbial foodborne illness and associated
deaths in the United States.
Dostları ilə paylaş: