Ielts speaking strategies

Part 3 speaking does require a lot more explanation , more opinions and they will require that you have some knowledge about things . This is where they start deciding if you can get a 7.0 because in part 3 speaking, you not only need to be influent and dramatically correct , but your answer needs to be very organized , and you need to be organized to over 5, 6 even 7 sentences, and you have to be prepared for the examiner to ask you follow-up questions that you might not expect.
Now, what is important in part 3 speaking? The important is that you do the best that you can in part 3 speaking to answer the question and to organize your answer . You don’t need a lot of ideas. Part 3 speaking might involve questions about more academic topics . They might ask you about “the environment” , they might ask you about “pollution” , they might ask you about “employment” but you should not be under pressure to come up with some original brilliant ideas. One of the big things about part 3 speaking is more important than the huge range of grammar and vocabulary that is your ORGANIZATION . Organization is how you answer the question. Without organization, perfect grammar and vocabulary go out the window. You need organization if you want to get a high band score in speaking. I have a method here that works for part 3 speaking and task 2 writing and the method is the one I call the “party scenario method” . It’s easy, let me show you how it works. This is what allows you to comfortably answer part 3 speaking questions. We will be working in details on
the language that you need, but the basics. The basic thing that you need is what I am going to show you right now:
STEP 1: First of all, just answer the question . If you have problems with grammar, part 3 speaking is not the time for you to try using big vocabulary words that you don’t know what they mean and long complicated sentences. If you have problems with grammar, you should be giving short sentences that are well linked. I am going to show you what I mean by this.
Let’s try this “should parents limit the amount of fast food their children eat?”
Just like part 1 speaking question, don’t forget to recognize that is an open or closed question. A lot of part 3 speaking questions will look like part 1 speaking questions. The only difference that the examiner wants more in part 3 speaking is they want you to have more explanations and more details .
So “should parents limit the amount of fast food their children eat?”

Step 1: Just answer the question

Yes, they should
Yes, that’s a good idea Yes, I think so
Certainly, parents should limit the amount of fast food their children eat.
Absolutely, parents should limit the amount of fast food their children eat . Yes, parents should limit the amount of fast food their children eat.
STEP 2: Answer why do you think that? Note that don’t get too specific ; don’
do what we call “don’t jump to conclusion”
The benefit of the method “party scenario” is that if you just ask and answer some simple questions like how, who, why, how often, what, when, where… simple, simple, simple, and simple detailed questions , you will be organizing your answer perfectly . You shouldn’t jump to the conclusion. Start your answer in a general way , then move towards specific .

+ What is the 1 ^st general reason why you think parents should limit the amount o

fast food their children eat? What’s wrong with fast food – give an adjective (unhealthy)