4. Enhance experience exchange and learning with other countries
Strengthen the experience exchange and study with other countries on statistics on trade in services, intensify the study and research of cities on statistics on trade in services, and organize special training to further improve the business level of the statistics on trade in services team. For example, in terms of data collection channels, by drawing on the advanced experience of the United States and the European Union in collecting statistical data on trade in services, more sample surveys, questionnaires, and focused surveys are used to collect data on trade in services.
5. Accelerate the construction of statistics on trade in services and the process of digital monitoring
Timely and accurate access to statistics on trade in services data is the premise and basis for grasping the new features and trends in the development of trade in services, implementing various support policies in the field of trade in services, and strengthening in-process and ex-post monitoring. We should speed up the digitalization process of service trade statistics construction, make good use of the digital platform to collect data, and improve the timeliness and flexibility of data acquisition. In addition, intensify the monitoring of data declaration, if necessary, through the introduction of third-party organizations to monitor and evaluate the data reported by various entities, to improve the quality of service trade data.
Part 4 Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of the Development Level of Trade in Services
Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of the Development Level of Trade in Services
Because there are four modes of service trade, the statistics data is not comprehensive, which is closely related to domestic industry, investment, and even consumption. Using the traditional scale of cross-border trade in services cannot fully reflect the level of development of service trade in each economy, nor can it fully reflect the development pattern of global service trade.
For example, in 2019, China's import and export of services was USD 783.9 billion, ranking second in the world. Is the development level of China's service trade really the second in the world? Another example is that Britain's service trade volume in 2019 was USD 700 billion, ranking behind China, but in fact, the comprehensive development level of British service trade should be higher than that of China. There are also similar examples from Germany, Japan, Singapore, etc.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
