T
HEORETICAL BACKGROUND
The new tourist’s behavior
Tourist activity negatively impacts the environment and its population (Buckley & Araujo, 1997;
Holleran, 2008). As realization of the environmental and social damage caused by tourism swells,
tourists will increasingly prefer to involve themselves in more sustainable and more responsible
forms of tourism (Dimanche & Smith, 1996).
3
We will try to draw up a general portrait of the new tourists, to define their expectations and their
characteristics in order to show how the main features of community-based ecotourism are a
suitable answer to current expectations of the new tourists.
Tourism is a dynamic phenomenon which involves the vagaries of human behavior and which
thus cannot be dissociated from the changes and transformations of a society (Le Roy, 1999). The
demand for mass tourism, which was insensitive to its economic, environmental and social
effects, is being replaced by a demand for sustainable tourism, more concerned of its impact. It
should be noted that the demand for sustainable tourism is far from being homogeneous. Indeed,
various tourist preferences exist and each tourist can have at once various and potentially
conflicting demands (Meyer, 2005). Nevertheless, some common characteristics and preferences
are emerging which make it possible to draw up a general portrait of a new tourist.
Initially, tourism was reserved for the elite. During the 1950s, tourism was extended to broader
layers of society largely as a result of the economic growth that ensued the end of World War II.
As a result of the rapid economic growth, les Trentes Glorieuses, lifestyles were transformed,
vacations were lengthened, purchasing power increased, and urbanization increased, thereby
reinforcing the demand for leisure (Le Roy, 1999). To meet this new demand, mass tourism was
developed which provided a fixed tourist package, identical for all customers (Cuvelier, 1994,
p.40).
Mass tourism is primarily centered on the pairings “sun and sea” and “sun and mountain.”
Tourist products are highly standardized and result in the development of destinations such as the
Balearic Islands or the French Riviera. This kind of tourism, referred to as “fordist”, is had by a
standard, inexperienced tourist, in search of hot climates and suntan within the framework of
organized holidays (Poon, 1993). Mass tourism came to its peak between 1970 and 1980 but
reached its quantitative and qualitative limits at the end of the 20th century (Moutinho, 2000).
4
In reaction came the advent of the new tourists or “post-fordist tourists” (Urry, 1995), who
rejected mass tourism and demanded alternative forms of tourism. New tourists can be
distinguished from former tourists because they are more experienced, more ecologically aware
but also more spontaneous and more unpredictable. New tourists are also accustomed to a greater
degree of flexibility and independence (Poon, 1993; Ioannides & Debbage, 1997).
The general framework of behavior has changed: travelers leave more frequently and for shorter
periods, distant destinations are preferred, people are no longer attached to a particular locality,
and rigidly packaged holidays are rejected in favor of unique designs (Poon, 1993; Urry, 1995).
The motivations to travel vary with a downward trend for the “
sun and sea
” destinations (Aguilo,
Alegre & Sard, 2005). ‘‘These new consumers want to be different from the crowd. They want to
affirm their individuality and they want to be in control’’ (Poon, 1993, p.219)
One of the most important characteristics of the new tourists is the commitment to responsible
travel, which is a product of increasing environmental concern as well as growing sympathy
toward the local populations of the visited countries. Additional characteristics of the new tourist
can be found in various studies which analyze types of tourists.
In the case study by King and Hyde (1989), anti-tourists are studied. Anti-tourists perceive
themselves as nonconformist and correspondingly pursue unique forms of tourism. They avoid
mass tourism and assign a great value to authenticity.
In the study by Dalen (1989), new tourists are identified as the modern idealists and the
traditional idealists
. The modern idealists seek excitement and entertainment but are also
interested in more intellectual and cultural activities. They refuse mass tourism and fixed
itineraries. The traditional idealists await a quality tourist offer that ensures peace and security as
well as visits to famous places and access to the culture and lifestyle of the local population.
5
The new tourist is also a synthesis of three types of tourists proposed by Cohen (1972): the
experiential tourist, the experimental tourist, and the existential tourist. The experiential tourist
is in search of authentic experiences. The principal desire of the experimental tourist is to be in
contact with the local population. The existential tourist wishes for total immersion in the local
culture and lifestyle. Each type wants to be affected by the local population rather than be
ignorant of the population and the impact of tourism.
Another interpretation of the new tourist is Gray’s (1970) wanderlust tourist who pursues multi-
destination holidays and seeks foreign cultural experiences to satisfy the hunger for learning as
well as for exoticism.
More recent studies (Crouch, Devinney, Dolnicar, Huybers, Louviere & Oppewal, 2005;
Dolnicar, Crouch & Long, 2008; Dolnicar & Matus, 2008) concentrate on environmental
awareness and detail the principal features of the environment-friendly tourists or ecotourists.
The environment-friendly tourists are different from the other tourists by their socio-demographic
characteristics, their behavior and their travel motivations (Crouch & al., 2005; Lawton, 2001).
They are young, have a higher level of education, a higher level of income and generally
originate from more developed countries (Dolnicar & al., 2008; Weaver & Lawton, 2007). These
tourists travel in families or groups of friends and search for friendly social encounters. They
appreciate physical exercise (like trekking), pay attention to what they eat, and appreciate nature
(AGRIDOC, 2004). The new tourist is close to the description of the backpacker (Paris & Teye,
2010) whose main motivations, among others, are personal and social growth, experience,
independence, acquisition of cultural knowledge, and relaxation.
The new tourists want to enrich their knowledge and are interested in learning during the vacation
(Dolnicar & al., 2008). Environment-friendly tourists are not only concerned with protection of
the environment; they also prioritize respect for host communities and their economic and social
6
development. There is an expectation on the part of the tourists for a tourist experience that
values sustainable development at the tourist destination. New tourists are attracted to tourist
opportunities that offer authentic contact with other cultures that have sustained traditions and
mutually offer comfort and distractions (Le Roy, 1999). The new tourists are looking for an
unfamiliar scene, which involves a new landscape as well as discovery of new cultural elements
and civilizations. Indeed, these travelers do not want to limit their contacts with the host
community to commercial contacts. They are open, active and interested in local populations,
their lifestyles, their habits, and their difficulties. They appreciate locally grown products and
traditional dishes. The new tourists are willing to donate money for development or humanitarian
projects if they can be sure of the destination of the donations (AGRIDOC, 2004). They are
respectful of local populations and their environment. They expect a warm and friendly welcome
from residents and hope that this hospitality will lead them to share their “intimacy”. Alexander,
Bakir and Wickens (2010) write that holidays are now seen as a way to learn about the self and
this phenomenon can be a result of interactions with the host community. In reaction to the
destructive impact of mass tourism and the expectations of the new tourists, alternative forms of
tourism have developed, such as pro-poor tourism (Briedenhann, 2011), volunteer tourism
(McGehee & Andereck, 2009), ecotourism (Sheyvens, 1999) and community-based ecotourism
(Okasaki, 2008). We will discuss community-based ecotourism.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |