48
(3),
where T
photomultiplier
, T
oscilloscope
and TTS denote the contribution to the observed rise time
due to the form
of the single photo-electron, oscilloscope bandwidth and transit time
spread, respectively. T
eff
denotes the overall effective contributions
due to the possible
deviation of the nominal values of the above mentioned properties from the values
provided by the manufacturers. T
photomultiplier
is equal to 1 ns [21], T
oscilloscope
calculated as
a ratio 350/bandwidth [80], is equal to 0.07 ns while TTS value is 0.27 ns [21]. Mean rise
time of the electric signals: t
10-90
is
equal to T
experiment
=1.22 ± 0.02 ns for BC-420 and
1.24 ± 0.02 ns for J-PET scintillator, respectively. This
implies that within the
measurement uncertainties the rise time of the scintillation in the J-PET scintillator is equal
to the rise time of the BC-420 scintillator and amounts to 0.50 ns [12].
Although the rise time of 0.05J-PET and BC-420 scintillators have the same values,
there is a slight difference in their decay time visible
even in signals shapes in
Fig. 20. Spectrum of 0.05J-PET is broaden in the region of the trailing edge in comparison
to spectrum of BC-420 scintillator. This suggests that the difference in decay time values
in both scintillators will be noticeable.
In ternary plastic scintillators the distribution of the time of photon emission
followed by the interaction of the gamma quantum at time Θ, is given by
formula 4 [81] [82]:
(4).
The Gaussian term with the standard deviation σ reflects the rate of energy transfer to the
primary solute, whereas t
r
and t
d
denote the average time of
the energy transfer to the
wavelength shifter and decay time of the final light emission, respectively. K stands for the
normalization constant.
Decay time of signals in plastic scintillators was determined by fitting sum of
functions given by formula 4 and formula 5 [83]:
49
(5),
where N,
,
and
denote fitting parameters, f
exp
- exponent function and f
Gauss
denotes
the Gauss function.
The formula consisting of the sum of functions given by formula 4 and 5 was fitted
to averaged signals registered by particular photomultipliers. The fit is shown in Fig. 21.
Dostları ilə paylaş: