“Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”
First of nine principles on first page of World Health Organization Constitution adopted in NYC in July 1946 by 61 nations
“spiritual well-being” added in 1999 by World Health Assembly, which at that time had 191 member states
http://www.ldb.org/iphw/whoconst.htm
How would this be operationalized for the following common queries?
What is the total impact of disease and injury in the population? -- the overall target for public health interventions?
Which diseases are most important for which groups?
Are things getting better or worse?
How do we compare the impacts of different risk factors and potential interventions that affect different populations?
For example, what is the burden of disease from environmental factors?
How does the impact of tobacco smoking compare to that from air pollution?
Environmental Health Effects
Example of results from outdoor air pollution studies
Asthma attacks
Missing workdays
Missing school days
Days with cough
Emergency room visits
Hospital admissions
Physician visits
Medication use
Daily death rate
Lung function
Self-reported health status
Etc.
How can these be compared across time, cities, countries, age groups, sectors (e.g., transport versus power plants), etc.?
Let alone compared with the health impacts from completely different risk factors, such as water pollution, lead exposure, high cholesterol, unsafe sex, etc.?
Need for a C4 Database in Health (Which we have had in many other fields for long periods)
Combined mortality and morbidity
Complete
Much of the world unrepresented in past databases
Many important disabilities unaccounted
Consistent definitions of disease states
Coherent
Deaths by disease need to add to total
By age and sex
Match with demographic stats
No natural discipline, i.e. no import stats from the afterlife tabulating how many died of what
Disability Adjusted Life Year The DALY, a kind of HALY
Principle #1: The only differences in the rating of a death or disability should be due to age and sex, not to income, culture, location, social class.
Principle #2: Everyone in the world has right to best life expectancy in world
DALY = YLL + YLD
Years of Lost Life (due to mortality)
Years Lost to Disability (due to injury & illness)
Years of Lost Life: Examples
What is Meant by “Disability?”
Impairment: Symptoms at organ level, e.g., broken leg
Disability: Objective alteration of behavior or performance at the individual level, e.g., cannot walk
“Handicap”: Changed interaction with others at the social/environmental level, e.g., cannot work
A. 100,000 children are stricken for 1 week with a disability weighting of 0.3; 2% die at 1 year old.
B. 100,000 adults are stricken for 2 years with a disability weighting of 0.6; 20% die at 80 years old.
A: YLL (= 2000 x 80) + YLD (=100k x (7/365) x 0.3) = 160,000 + 575 = 160,600
B: YLL (= 20,000 x 8) + YLD (=100k x 2 x 0.6) = 160,000 + 120,000 = 280,000
Occam's Razor
“One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything”
Occam's razor is a logical principle attributed to the 14th Century philosopher William of Occam (or Ockham). The principle states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. This principle is often called the
Principle of Parsimony
The DALY Passes Occam’s razor criterion, because it reveals something different from deaths
Examples of Using a C4 database: World DALYS Lost (2000)
Impact of Development on Women and Children
Child Cluster Diseases: the World’s Largest Scandal
1.4 million children
Rates in LDCs are thousands of times those in MDCs (Africa = 4700x that of W. Europe)
Vaccine coverage in Africa went from 60% in 1990 to 46% in 1999
Has stayed at 70% in South Asia for many years
Relative Risks between Poor Africa and USA
Chance of woman dying in childbirth: 400 times greater
Comparison of GBD Estimates for 2005 with GBD for 1990
Population: 5.3/6.4 billion (+21%)
Deaths: 50/64 million (+28%)
DALYs: +7%
DALYS/capita: -11%
I = 44/38.5%;
II = 41/48.9%;
III = 15/12.5%
Changes in Important Diseases: 1990-2005 What is happening with each?
Diarrhea: 7.3/3.9% (-42% in absolute terms)
ARI: 8.5/5.9% (-25%)
Malaria: 2.3/2.3% (-6%)
Lung Cancer: 0.65/0.8% (+32%)
TB: 2.8/2.1% (-18%)
HIV: 0.8/5.6% (7.4 times as much)
Depression: 4.7/5.8 (+29%)
Can we reach public health?
Is there a absolute value of health (lost DALYs) beyond which society does not have an obligation to exceed?
Is there a cost per unit improvement in health ($ per DALY) above which society does not benefit from further expenditure?
Entry into GBD databases
Best single modern book covering the GBD and CRA ideas, methods, and results, but without full detail and sophistication/complexity: Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors, (Lopez, Mathers, Ezzati, Jamison, Murray) Oxford University and World Bank Presses, 2006. 475 pp. Fully downloadable at http://www.dcp2.org/pubs/GBD which also has links to data used in the book.
Best single page to find GBD data divided by world regions defined in several ways (WHO regions, World Bank regions, income groups etc.) for 2004. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/index.html
For projections to 2030 and links to dozens of other publications, see http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/index.html
The full set of background materials and pubs of the previous (2004) Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) covering 26 major risk factors, environmental and other: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/cra/en/index.html
Full databases for the previous CRA study: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/risk_factors/en/index.html
Description of the GBD/CRA 2005 Revisions now underway: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_2005_study/en/index.html