acknowledged, ―The Constitution does
not explicitly mention any right of
privacy!‖
1033
Furthermore, an earlier case
ruled against it,
1034
they couldn‘t decide
which law it might be under
1035
and
acknowledged that privacy in all cases
cannot be absolute.
1036
Is personal privacy desirable? Sure! I‘m
all for it. I think as Justice White
realized, the difference here is that there
is no moment where the human fetus
turns into a baby, and so this decision
needs to be recognized for its differences
to other privacy laws.
1037
When dealing
with someone‘s right to privacy versus
life, life weighs more. Indeed, how can
you enjoy any other rights if you are not
alive to experience them?
Contradiction!
When the Supreme Court didn‘t find
the word ―unborn‖ in the Constitution,
they said that human rights mustn‘t
apply to them.
But when the Supreme Court didn‘t find
the word ―abortion‖ in the Constitution
they decided to assume it was intended
and legalized abortion!
In conclusion, you‘ve now heard the
background to this topic and the three
reasons why abortion is not really legal.
Abortion was not voted in legally by our
representatives, was not the will of the
people and is not found in our Constitution.
Just because it‘s legal doesn‘t mean it's
right, but more to the point, it‘s not even
legal!
Could the Supreme Court ever overrule
its own decision on the matter? Sure,
they‘ve reversed major decisions only about
100 times!
1038
334
Quotable Quote
―Our nationwide policy of abortion-on-
demand through all nine months of
pregnancy was neither voted for by our
people nor enacted by our legislators —
not a single state had such unrestricted
abortion before the Supreme Court
decreed it to be national policy in
1973.‖
1039
—Ronald Reagan, former U.S. President
Reason #77
―Abortion was illegally made
legal!‖
Reason #78
Have a child now
while you can
Not everyone can have a
child when they want to
ave you ever thought about the
large numbers of women who
can‘t get pregnant when they want
to? Okay, maybe you haven‘t. Especially if
you‘re pregnant now and don‘t want to be!
But, think of it now. Imagine being one of
those who can‘t conceive because of
complications from an earlier abortion or
maybe never finding the right person or
maybe a health condition that means you
can‘t carry a pregnancy to term. (There are
a couple of stories like this in
Reason #29:
Abortion may affect your future fertility
.
)
I think many people want to be
pregnant, just
not
now
, not under
these
circumstances
. The weird thing is — and
I‘m just as guilty as the rest of us here — is
that we spend so much of our youth trying
to avoid getting pregnant at all costs; and
then when we get older and suddenly wake
up and the baby urge kicks in, we‘ll try
anything if it will just give us that wanted
pregnancy. Some do get pregnant. Others
don‘t. You just don‘t know what the future
H
335
holds.
The popularity of country music star
Kellie Coffey‘s song, ―I Would Die For
That,‖ shows that it touched people‘s
hearts. For those who don‘t know the song,
it‘s about how her best friend made the
choice (to abort) and how she would die for
that chance, how her husband and her both
wonder whose fault it is that they can‘t get
pregnant, how all she wants is a family,
before her time is up, to have that chance,
how she would die for that. It‘s a powerful,
emotional song, and when you read the
comments on You Tube
you realize just
how many people are really struggling with
not being able to conceive. I know, it‘s
mind boggling. So much emotion. So many
people are just hoping and praying they can
have a child. So many people crying in
response to her song and wishing each
other good luck with getting pregnant.
When you read all the comments about
how many years they‘ve been trying to
conceive and all the miscarriages they‘ve
had, it just makes you realize. You could be
more lucky than you think.
Your biological clock
lright, since many of you reading
this book are possibly between 15
and 25 — possibly — I am going to
bring up this topic but I‘m not going to
rehash it.
Here are just a few things for you to
consider:
Your fertility peaks between 20-30, an
age when many today are just starting
their career or considering commitment
in a relationship.
1040
A major cause of infertility is age-
related.
With
all
the
career
advancement going on — often at the
sacrifice of a child (quite literally),
women are now starting families in their
thirties and forties. For some women,
though, this will be too late.
Between 1989-1999, less than 200
women over the age of 50 actually
succeeded in giving birth.
1041
No amount of money or technology can
turn back the clock or make you
younger.
Are women missing out?
study of 1,168 professional women
across America found that ―high
achieving‖ women 40 years old had
a 33% chance of being childless, despite the
fact that only 14% of them had ever
planned it that way.
For ―ultra-achieving‖ women, 49%
found themselves missing the achievement
of motherhood.
1042
They didn‘t plan to be
childless yet at age 40 when the cost of IVF
is something like $12 000 per round
1043
and
A
A
336
the success rate a short 3-5%,
1044
they found
themselves looking down the barrel of a
future without children.
Agency and private adoptions can cost
anywhere from $5,000 to $40,000.
1045
People can pay up to $30,000 to have
someone bear their biological child.
1046
Even radical pro-choicers like Germaine
Greer have their moments. Upon turning
40 and childless she was reported to have
told a British magazine, ―I was desperate for
a baby and I have the medical bills to prove
it. I still have pregnancy dreams, waiting
for something that will never happen.‖
1047
Of course, not everyone wants to have
children in their life, but a large majority
do. The fact is, if you leave childbearing till
you are too old, no one is going to be able
to give you back those lost years.
I guess what no one knows for sure is,
will you get another chance? Most of you
will, but statistically, a small few of you
will not.
Reason #78
A future pregnancy is not
guaranteed
Reason #79
The population
explosion is an urban
myth
Too many people? I don‘t
think so!
id you know that many countries
around the world today have birth
rates that are below replacement
levels? Want some examples?
After an earlier population boom, Iran
now has lower than replacement birth
levels — helped in part by free condoms
and vasectomies — not to mention reduced
maternity benefits.
1048
The birthrate in Europe is below
replacement level.
1049
Russia is shrinking by a staggering
700,000 people per year.
1050
This should
come as no surprise since abortion is now
twice as common as birth.
1051
The
government is now trying desperately to
reverse this de-population trend by holding
pregnancy competitions and offering
rewards such as a fridge or TV to successful
couples.
1052
Western Europe currently has 1/6 of the
population aged 65 and over. By 2030, 1/3
D
337
of the population will be gray.
1053
A growth
in the aging population means a
tremendous burden on Social Security. As
their medical and nursing needs skyrocket,
there will need to be more young workers
in the population to provide taxes for their
Social Security. This is also an issue in
America.
1054
Q. ―But the cities are crowded!‖
A. ―Yes, but over-concentration of
people in cities is not the same as
overpopulation.‖
What can be done as the percentage of
old people gets bigger and the medical
system get worse and worse? The
government could run out of money with
which to fund these projects, leaving old
people
without
services.
Or
the
government could increase immigration
with nationalities that include workers and
future parents to help boost the economy.
Or, we could stop aborting our children.
Some countries such as France are trying
to remedy this lack of babies. France now
offers incentives such as a year‘s maternity
leave for a woman‘s third child and many
discounts, subsidies and tax breaks. It seems
to be working and the birthrate is
increasing. Maybe they will soon be at
replacement level.
1055
In Japan an estimated 63,000 teachers
have lost their jobs and more than 2,000
schools have closed down due to lack of
students. The baby shortage is so real that
Japanese department stores are closing
down play areas and replacing them with
adult recreation spaces. Theme parks for
children are closing down, while another
was opened recently for adults.
1056
This is
only the tip of the iceberg for Japan. The
low birthrate is changing many areas of
their society.
1057
In our own country, America, we are
just over replacement level with 2006 being
the first time since 1971 that we are not
below replacement level.
1058
If you‘re
wondering how we could have had such
low levels but still be a large nation, the
answer is immigration. Immigration boosts
our population levels by bringing in many
more families and nationalities more
willing to give birth. This is evidenced by
the fact that the general percentage of
births are down but Hispanic births have
almost doubled.
1059
Did you know that it requires an
average of 2.1 children per woman to
sustain the population at zero population
growth? In other words, no change in the
current population size. The United States
is actually under replacement level, having
been listed as having 2.05 children per
women for the 2009 estimate by the CIA —
and yes, I didn‘t know they did population
338
figures either!
1060
In third world countries
where you might not live to have a child
the replacement rate must be higher, up to
3.3 children per woman.
1061
Are some countries still growing? Sure
they are. Particularly in Africa. But I hope
you‘ll see further down that people are not
the root cause of our problems.
The nutty side of population fanatics
I was once severely criticized for
describing human beings as being the
―AIDS of the Earth.‖ I make no apologies
for
that
statement…reduce
human
populations to fewer than one billion…
Who should have children?…a very small
percentage of humans
.
1062
—Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
The
hopeful
alternative
to
the
extinction of millions of species of plants
and animals is the voluntary extinction of
one species: Homo sapiens... us.
1063
—Voluntary Human Extinction Movement
So the first task is population control at
home. How do we go about it?... One plan
often mentioned involves the addition of
temporary sterilants to water supplies or
staple food… The option isn‘t even open to
us, thanks to the criminal inadequacy of
biomedical research…
1064
Obviously, such measures would need
coordination by a powerful governmental
agency… In the first area it would promote
intensive investigation of new techniques
of birth control, possibly leading to the
development of mass sterilization agents
such as were discussed above… Many
people‘s lack the incentive to use the Pill. A
program requiring daily attention just will
not work… We need a federal law
guaranteeing the right of any woman to
have an abortion...
1065
—
The Population Bomb
At present the population of the world
is increasing... War, so far, has had no very
great effect on this increase... I do not
pretend that birth control is the only way
in which population can be kept from
increasing. There are others... If a Black
Death could be spread throughout the
world once in every generation survivors
could procreate freely without making the
world too full... The state of affairs might be
somewhat unpleasant, but what of that?
Really high-minded people are indifferent
to happiness, especially other people‘s
.
1066
—Bertrand Russell (advisor to presidents) in
The Impact of Science on Society
Would you have guessed?
Many of the individuals who were
involved in the eugenics movement
went on to direct the birth control
programs that are around today.
1067
339
So if it‘s not
overpopulation, what causes
starvation, war and
environmental problems?
Starvation
In the modern world, people starve en
masse not because famine is unavoidable.
They starve instead because their own
rulers happen to be indifferent to their
plight, or because the state under which
they live has actively contrived to bring
about their death….
1068
—Nicholas Eberstadt, political economist
f you look at society today, it‘s clear
there are problems, yet I don‘t buy
into the idea that people per se are the
cause of these problems. There are too
many
greedy
people, but not too many
people.
One aspect that I believe is often
overlooked is bankers. Yes, large banks
such as the International Monetary Fund
come up to a third world nation and offer
to lend them all this money so that they
can develop their country. The country
accepts the loan but for whatever reason
cannot pay it back on time. Maybe the
leaders were corrupt and wasted the
money, maybe it was just not enough, or
perhaps the bankers knew they could never
pay it back — whatever. However, now the
bankers come back and say, I want my
money NOW. You have to pay high
interest and we‘re going to dictate your
economic policies so that you can pay us
back soon because you owe us big time.
And so, the people no longer run the
country‘s policies; the bankers do.
Here is a tragic example of how bankers,
not large families, cause hardship and
suffering. In 2000, the World Bank
required Bolivia to privatize their public
water system as part of the deal for re-
financing. The new privatized corporation
forbids collecting rain (!) and charges such
high rates that the poor people are faced
with a very real crisis. For a poor person,
the cost of water may be a whole quarter of
their income. To obtain water they must
now forgo their child‘s education, needed
medical care or maybe even dip into their
food budget. As you can imagine, the need
for water is only second to the need for air.
It‘s not a luxury. That means the rest of
living standards fall while people pay
exorbitantly for plain old tap water. I
know, it‘s hard for us even to imagine.
Of course, there are also other ‗natural‘
causes of poverty, such as drought and
floods and other natural disasters which
affect crop production. Infighting between
neighboring tribes can cause food shortages.
Limited access to farming technologies can
hinder production levels. There are many
reasons for poverty — but let‘s look at them
I
340
all instead of just assuming that population
is somehow the cause.
War
ust as war can contribute to poverty, so
poverty
can
contribute
to
war.
Ignorance and hate, as well as the
interests of multinational companies, all
play a part. Remember, war is a very
profitable endeavor. War does not exist
because there are too many people. War
exists because people can‘t get along.
Actually, I think that‘s oversimplifying it.
There are big profits to be made in war, and
whenever the economy gets really bad you
can always count on it to boost industry.
Sad but true.
Environmental Degradation
5% of the World‘s Population consumes a
third of its resources and makes nearly half
its waste. That 5% is US .
—Anonymous bumper sticker
ep, that‘s us, America. Despite
our very low birthrate, we consume
1/3 of the world‘s resources and
make nearly half of its waste. While we are
barely above replacement birthrate, we do
far more damage than any of the
developing nations who are still growing.
People aren‘t the cause of the problem.
Well, maybe uneducated ones. But we can
educate people, and even if we can‘t
educate the big corporations, we can
boycott them and force them to use better
business practices that way.
Remember, it‘s not the number of
people on Earth; it‘s how they treat the
earth. It doesn‘t take a lot of corporations to
wreck the environment nor do lots of
people mean we can‘t live in harmony.
Difficult Questions
If you can agree with abortion to
promote the goal of decreasing the
world‘s population, why not start with
those already living?
Why make the upcoming generation
pay for the faults of the current
generation?
What? I didn‘t address your concern?
You were thinking about global warming?
Good question. That‘s a big one in the
news these days. The interesting thing
about global warming is there is no
universal consensus. (I know, that‘s not
what you hear in the media.) We do know
that temperatures absolutely do fluctuate
and the earth goes through cycles. Whether Dostları ilə paylaş: |